Don’t learn to code: Nvidia’s founder Jensen Huang advises a different career path::Don’t learn to code advises Jensen Huang of Nvidia. Thanks to AI everybody will soon become a capable programmer simply using human language.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Founder of company which makes major revenue by selling GPUs for machine learning says machine learning is good.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes but Nvidia relies heavily on programmers themselves. Without them Nvidia wouldn’t have a single product. The fact that he despite this makes these claims is worth taking note.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lol. They’re at the top of the food chain. They can afford the best developers. They do not benefit from competition. As with all leading tech corporations, they are protectionist, and benefit more from stifling competition than from innovation.

        Also, more broadly the oligarchy don’t want the masses to understand programming because they don’t want them to fundamentally understand logic, and how information systems work, because civilization is an information system. It makes more sense when you realize Linux/FOSS is the socialism of computing, and anti-competitive closed source corporations like Nvidia (notorious for hindering Linux and FOSS) are the capitalist class of computing.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t make him wrong.

      Just like we can now uss LLM to create letters or emails with a tone, it’s not going to be a big leap to allow it to do similar with coding. It’s quite exciting, really. Lots of people have ideas for websites or apps but no technical knowledge to do it. AI may allow it, just like it allows non artists to create art.

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I use AI to write code for work every day. Many different models and services, including https://ollama.ai on my own hardware. It’s useful for a developer when they can take the code and refactor it to fit into large code-bases (after fixing its inevitable broken code here and there), but it is by no means anywhere close to actually successfully writing code all on its own. Eventually maybe, but nowhere near anytime soon.

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Agreed. I mainly use it for learning.

          Instead of googling and skimming a couple blogs / so posts, I now just ask the AI. It pulls the exact info I need and sources it all. And being able to ask follow up questions is great.

          It’s great for learning new languages and frameworks

          It’s also very good at writing unit tests.

          Also for recommending Frameworks/software for your use case.

          I don’t see it replacing developers, more reducing the number of developers needed. Like excel did for office workers.

          • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You just described all of my use cases. I need to get more comfortable with copilot and codeium style services again, I enjoyed them 6 months ago to some extent. Unfortunately current employer has to be federally compliant with government security protocols and I’m not allowed to ship any code in or out of some dev machines. In lieu of that, I still run LLMs on another machine acting, like you mentioned, as sort of my stackoverflow replacement. I can describe anything or ask anything I want, and immediately get extremely specific custom code examples.

            I really need to get codeium or copilot working again just to see if anything has changed in the models (I’m sure they have.)

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It can’t tell yet when the output is ridiculous or incorrect for non coding, but it will get there. Same for coding. It will continue to grow in complexity and ability.

          It will get there, eventually. I don’t think it will be writing complex code any time soon, but I can see it being aware of all the libraries and foss that a person cannot be across.

          I would foresee learning to code as similar to learning to do accounting manually. Yes, you’ll still need to understand it to be a coder, but for the average person that can’t code, it will do a good enough job, like we use accounting software now for taxes or budgets that would have been professionally done before. For complex stuff, it will be human done, or human reviewed, or professional coders giving more technical instructions for ai. For simple coding, like you might write a python script now, for some trivial task, ai will do it.

      • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        It might not make him wrong, but he also happens to be wrong.

        You can’t compare AI art or literature to AI software, because the former are allowed to be vague or interpretive while the latter has to be precise and formally correct. AI can’t even reliably do art yet, it frequently requires several attempts or considerable support to get something which looks right, but in software “close” frequently isn’t useful at all. In fact, it can easily be close enough to look right at first glance while actually being catastopically wrong once you try to use it for real (see: every bug in any released piece of software ever)

        Even when AI gets good enough to reliably produce what it’s asked for first time & every time (which is a long way away for quite a while yet), a sufficiently precise description of what you want is exactly what programmers spend their lives writing. Code is a description of a program which another program (such as a compiler) can convert into instructions for the computer. If someone comes up with a very clever program which can fill in the gaps by using AI to interpret what it’s been given, then what they’ve created is just a new kind of programming language for a new kind of compiler

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t disagree with your point. I think that is where we are heading. How we interact with computers will change. We’re already moving away from keyboard typing and clicks, to gestures and voice or image recognition.

          We likely won’t even call it coding. Hey Google, I’ve downloaded all the episodes for the current season of Pimp My PC, can you rename the files by my naming convention and drop them into jellyfin. The AI will know to write a python script to do so. I expect it to be invisible to the user.

          So, yes, it is just a different instruction set. But that’s all computers are. Data in, data out.

      • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well difference is you have to know coming to know did the AI produce what you actually wanted.

        Anyone can read the letter and know did the AI hallucinate or actually produce what you wanted.

        On code. It might produce code, that by first try does what you ask. However turns AI hallucinated a bug into the code for some edge or specialty case.

        Hallucinating is not a minor hiccup or minor bug, it is fundamental feature of LLMs. Since it isn’t actually smart. It is a stochastic requrgitator. It doesn’t know what you asked or understand what it is actually doing. It is matching prompt patterns to output. With enough training patterns to match one statistically usually ends up about there. However this is not quaranteed. Thus the main weakness of the system. More good training data makes it more likely it more often produces good results. However for example for business critical stuff, you aren’t interested did it get it about right the 99 other times. It 100% has to get it right, this one time. Since this code goes to a production business deployment.

        I guess one can code comprehensive enough verified testing pattern including all the edge cases and with thay verify the result. However now you have just shifted the job. Instead of programmer programming the programming, you have programmer programming the very very comprehensive testing routines. Which can’t be LLM done, since the whole point is the testing routines are there to check for the inherent unreliability of the LLM output.

        It’s a nice toy for someone wanting to make a quick and dirty test code (maybe) to do thing X. Then try to find out does this actually do what I asked or does it have unforeseen behavior. Since I don’t know what the behavior of the code is designed to be. Since I didn’t write the code. good for toying around and maybe for quick and dirty brainstorming. Not good enough for anything critical, that has to be guaranteed to work with promise of service contract and so on.

        So what the future real big job will be is not prompt engineers, but quality assurance and testing engineers who have to be around to guard against hallucinating LLM/ similar AIs. Prompts can be gotten from anyone, what is harder is finding out did the prompt actually produced what it was supposed to produce.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Until somewhere things go wrong and the supplier tries the “but an AI wrote it” as a defense when the client sues them for not delivering what was agreed upon and gets struck down, leading to very expensive compensations that spook the entire industry.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Aor Canada already tried that and lost. They had to refund the customer as the chatbot gave incorrect information.

  • slappy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t listen to electrical engineers, unless they are warning against licking a battery.

    Do listen to whatever your gut says you want to do for a career.

    Do learn to use AI in some fashion, even if for shits and giggles.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use “AI” when I work. It’s like having a really smart person who knows a bit about everything available 24/7 with useful responses. Sure, it’s not all right, but it usually leads me down the path to solving my problem a lot faster than I could with “Googling.” Remember Google? What a joke.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think it‘s less of a really smart person and more of a very knowledgeable person with an inflated ego so you take everything they say with a grain of salt. Useful nonetheless.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think a colleague of mine made a great comparison: It’s like having access to a thousand junior devs who can reply really fast.

    • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just being a stickler here but Electronics Engineers, not Electrical. Similar sounding but like the difference between a submarine captain and an airplane captain.

      • slappy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I said what I said, Jensen has an EE degree. After witnessing college aged engineers, we’re all doomed.

    • ___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This. The technology is here to stay and will literally change the world. In a few years when the Sora and SD3 models are released and well understood, and desktop GPUs begin offering 24GB vram to midrange cards out of demand, it will be crazier than we can imagine. LLMs are already near human level with enough compute. As tech gets faster and commoditized, everyone becomes and artist and a programmer. Information will no longer be trusted, and digital verification technology will proliferate.

      Invest now.

      That and nuclear batteries capable of running pi like machines for decades. 1w is on the horizon by BetaVolt.

      • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not sure why you’re being downvoted. I don’t think the current technology is going to replace programmers or artists any time soon (speaking as someone who works as an artist and programmer in a field that monitors ai and its uses) but I also acknowledge that my guess is as good as yours.

        I don’t think it’s going to replace artists because as impressive as the demos we all see are, inevitably, whenever I’ve done any thorough testing, every AI model fails at coming up with something new. It’s so held back by what it’s trained on, that to contemplate it replacing an artist - who are very capable of imagining new things - seems absurd to me.

        Same with programming - ask for something it doesn’t know about and it’ll lie and make something up and confidently proclaim it as truth. It can’t fact check itself and so I can only see it as a time saving tool for professionals and a really cool way for hobbyists to get results that were otherwise off the table.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I cant speak for certain about generating art, I’m no artist and my limit of experience there is playing around with stable diffusion, but it feels like its in the same place as LLMs for programming. Its incredibly impressive at first but once you’ve used it for a bit the flaws become obvious. It will be a very powerful tool for artists to use, just like LLMs are for programming, and will likely significantly increase the time needed to produce something, but is nowhere near replacing a human entirely.

          • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, for art it’s similar, you can get some really compelling results, but once tasked with creating something a bit too specific it ends up wasting your time more than anything.

            There’s definitely uses for it and it’s really cool, but I don’t think it’s as close to replacing professionals as some people think.

      • 🅿🅸🆇🅴🅻@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Unique style paintings will become even more valuable in the future. Generative AI only spews “art” based on previous styles it learned / was trained on. Everything will be even more rehashed than it is today (nod to Everything is a Remix). Having a painting made by an actual human hand on your wall will be more ego-boosting than an AI generated one.

        Sure, for general digital art (ie logos, game character design, etc) when uniqueness isn’t really mandatory, AI is a good, very cheap tool.

        As for the “everyone becomes a programmer” part… naah.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Having a painting made by an actual human hand on your wall will be more ego-boosting

          Nothing really changes, this has always been the case.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I worry for the future generations that cant debug cos they dont know how to program and just use ai.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Having used Chat GPT to try to find solutions to software development challenges, I don’t think programmers will be at that much risk from AI for at least a decade.

    Generative AI is great at many things, including assistance with basic software development tasks (like spinning up blueprints for unit tests). And it can be helpful filling in code gaps when provided with a very specific prompt… sometimes. But it is not great at figuring out the nuances of even mildly complex business logic.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This.
      I got a github copilot subscription at work and its useful for suggesting code in small parts, but i would never let it decide what design pattern to use to tackle the problem we are solving. Once i know the solution i can use ai, and verify its output to use in the code

      • DjMeas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m using it at work as well and Copilot has been pretty decent with writing out entire methods when I start with the jsdoc or code comments before writing the actual method. It’s now becoming my habit to have it generate some near-code or decent boilerplate.

        If you haven’t tried it yet, give this a shot!

    • Schal330@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m a junior dev that has been on the job for ~6 months. I found AI to be useful for learning when I had to make an application in Swift and had zero experience of the language. It presented me with some turd responses, but from this it gave me the idea of what to try and what to look into to find answers.

      I find that sometimes AI can present a concept to me in a way I can understand, where blogs can fail. I’m not worried about AI right now, it’s a tool to make our jobs easier!

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it will get good enough to do simple tickets on its own with oversight, but I would not trust it without it submitting it via a pr for review and iteration.

      I agree, it would take at least a decade for fully autonomous programming, and frankly, by the time it can fully replace programmers it will be able to fully replace every office job, at which point were going to have to rethink everything.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    the day programming is fully automated, so will other jobs.

    maybe it’d make more sense if he suggested to be a blue collar worker instead.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Human can probably still look forward to back breaking careers of manual labor that consist of complex varied movements!

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      At best, in the near term (5-10 years), they’ll automate the ability to generate moderate complexity classes and it’ll be up to a human developer to piece them together into a workable application, likely having to tweak things to get it working (this is already possible now with varying degrees of success/utter failure, but it’s steadily improving all the time). Additionally, developers do far more than just purely code. Ask any mature dev team and those who have no other competent skills outside of coding aren’t considered good workers/teammates.

      Now, in 10+ years, if progress continues as it has without a break in pace… Who knows? But I agree with you, by the time that happens with high complexity/high reliability for software development, numerous other job fields will have already become automated. This is why legislation needs to be made to plan for this inevitability. Whether that’s thru UBI or some offshoot of it or even banning automation from replacing major job fields, it needs to be seriously discussed and acted upon before it’s too little too late.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You remember when everyone was predicting that we are a couple of years away from fully self-driving cars. I think we are now a full decade after those couple of years and I don’t see any fully self driving car on the road taking over human drivers.

    We are now at the honeymoon of the AI and I can only assume that there would be a huge downward correction of some AI stocks who are overvalued and overhyped, like NVIDIA. They are like crypto stock, now on the moon tomorrow, back to Earth.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Two decades. DARPA Grand Challenge was in 2004.

      Yeah, everybody always forgets the hype cycle and the peak of inflated expectations.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Waymo exists and is now moving passengers around in three major cities. It’s not taking over yet, but it’s here and growing.The timeframe didn’t meet the hype but the technology is there.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, the technology is there but it is not Level 5, it is 3.5-4 at best.

        The point with a full self-driving car is that complexity increases exponentially once you reach 98-99% and the last 1-2% are extremely difficult to crack, because there are so many corner cases and cases you can’t really predict and you need to make a car that drives safer than humans if you really want to commercialize this service.

        Same with generative AI, the leap at first was huge, but comparing GPT 3.5 to 4 or even 3 to 4 wasn’t so great. And I can only assume that from now on achieving progress will get exponentially harder and it will require usage of different yet unknown algorithms and models and advances will be a lot more modest.

        And I don’t know for you but ChatGPT isn’t 100% correct especially when asking more niche questions or sending more complex queries and often it hallucinates and sometimes those hallucinations sound extremely plausible.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Quantuum computing is going to make all encryption useless!! Muwahahahahaaa!

      . . . Any day now . . Maybe- ah! No, no thought this might be the day, but no, not yet.

      Any day now.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well. That’s stupid.

    Large language models are amazingly useful coding tools. They help developers write code more quickly.

    They are nowhere near being able to actually replace developers. They can’t know when their code doesn’t make sense (which is frequently). They can’t know where to integrate new code into an existing application. They can’t debug themselves.

    Try to replace developers with an MBA using a large language model AI, and once the MBA fails, you’ll be hiring developers again - if your business still exists.

    Every few years, something comes along that makes bean counters who are desperate to cut costs, and scammers who are desperate for a few bucks, declare that programming is over. Code will self-write! No-code editors will replace developers! LLMs can do it all!

    No. No, they can’t. They’re just another tool in the developer toolbox.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been a developer for over 20 years and when I see Autogen generate code, decide to execute that code and then fix errors by making a decision to install dependencies, I can tell you I’m concerned. LLMs are a tool, but a tool that might evolve to replace us. I expect a lot of software roles in ten years to look more like an MBA that has the ability to orchestrate AI agents to complete a task. Coding skills will still matter, but not as much as soft skills will.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    This seems as wise as Bill Gates claiming 4MB of ram is all you’ll ever need back on 98 🙄

  • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jensen fucking Huang is a piece of shit and choke full of it too

    Actually, AI can replace this dick at a fraction of the cost instead of replacing developers. Bring out the guillotine mfs

    • gaifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your vulgarity and call to violence are quite convincing, sir. Mayhaps you moonlight as a bard?

  • swayevenly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think the Jensen quote loosley implies we don’t need to learn a programming language but the logic was flimsy. Same goes for the author as they backtrack a few times. Not a great article in my opinion.

    • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Jensen’s just trying to ride the AI bubble as far as itll go, next hell tell you to forget about driving or studying

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This overglorified snake oil salesmanman is scared.

    Anyone who understands how these models works can see plain as day we have reached peak LLM. Its not enshitifying on itself and we are seeing its decline in real time with quality of generated content. Dont believe me? Go follow some senior engineers.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You asked the question already answered. Pick your platform and you will find a lot of public research on the topic. Specifically for programming even more so

      • thirteene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is a reason they didn’t offer specific examples. LLM can still scale by size, logical optimization, training optimization, and more importantly integration. The current implementation is reaching it’s limits but pace of growth is also happening very quickly. AI reduces workload, but it is likely going to require designers and validators for a long time.

        • Wooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          For sure evidence is mounting that model size benefit is not returning the quality expected. Its also had the larger net impact of enshitifying itself with negative feedback loops between training data, humans and back to training. This one being quantified as a large declining trend in quality. It can only get worse as privacy, IP laws and other regulations start coming into place. The growth this hype master is selling is pure fiction.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            But he has a lot of product to sell.

            And companies will gobble it all up.

            On an unrelated note, I will never own a new graphics card.

            • Wooki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Secondhand is better value, still new cost right now is nothing short of price fixing. You only need look at the size reduction in memory since A100 was released to know what’s happening to gpu’s.

              We need serious competition, hopefully intel is able to but foreign competition would be best.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I doubt that any serious competitor will bring any change to this space. Why would it - everyone will scream ‘shut up and take my money’.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Fediverse is sadly not as popular as we would like sorry cant help here. That said i follow some researchers blogs and a quick search should land you with some good sources depending on your field of interest