“ kimberly guilfoyle”

I’m sorry, that’s not the problem. The original complaint was that the media would NOT reach a conclusion. I am defending the refusal to jump to conclusions.

People can speculate, but saying “why didn’t the news diagnose the problem from the beginning?” is an asinine question.

Sure. Anyone can challenge a legit news source through litigation. How often do you think NYTimes is sent legal threats over factual questions in their reporting? Probably dozens of letters each week. Why do those letters never result in lawsuits with real results? Because the papers keep their records tight.

Circumstantial evidence made it damn clear!

Jesus it’s like nobody has ever read a crime thriller in their life. This is like chapter 1 misdirection

Insults are fun and all, but nobody seems able to show me coherent evidence as to why there was definitive proof on day 1

I like how every time I see this identical picture it’s cropped slightly smaller so people can claim it’s a unique image

Why would you farm a site with 1/1000th the users when you can just farm the original site?

The Reddit repost bots that I remember on here were just to stimulate growth so there’d be content for people to discuss

Anything thats rated for a certain db reduction. I like disposable ones personally because they tend to be more comfortable (edit: or maybe I just refuse to try the insanely expensive shit, so I could be missing out). The 3M ones in the article you linked look great, just make sure you know how to roll them and insert them

Awww cute line kids. But we know obvious shills when we see them

That’s cute and all. What evidence did you have on day 1?

The manifesto that we got the day of the shooting? Care to share that one with me? I’ve only seen the current one

You can talk to your union though. Sometimes they can help find you employment at a related union shop or another shop within that union

Before we knew anything about him, it was just as plausible that he killed the CEO for authorizing payments for abortion. It wasn’t clear it had anything to do with wealth in the beginning

Maybe the no swearing thing is part of the reason?

Legitimate news outlets do pretty thorough fact-checking, if only to avoid litigation

Stop posting on irrelevant communities

What happened in Michigan elections? I didn’t think it was a big shift

Weird copypasta from Russian shills but okay

To clarify, the admins have updated their views in reaction to this week and user feedback:

Following a discussion in our team we want to clarify that we are no longer requesting moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification in the context of violent crimes when the crime in question already happened. We will still consider suggestions of jury nullification for crimes that have not (yet) happened as advocation for violence, which is violating our terms of service.

I mean, he has a very active Twitter account