I think it could be as simple as party x claims they will do thing a, b, c and then after their term in power you assess if they achieved those things. The parties who make the claims will need to back up those claims with real milestones that would become performance indicators of partial or full success. The milestones must be easy to assess and leave no room for interpretation. Just like in a legal contract, if you make the wording too vague and hard to interpret, then your contract won’t be enforceable in court.

See my response above that takes this into consideration.

I guess the pandering people pleasing approaches would overly benefit from this design but it could be more realistic if you showed a percentage next to the answer of the likelihood that the party will follow through with the statement based on their previous claims and achievements. This would make the parties less willing to make false claims or go back on their promises once in power because it would reflect badly in the next election.

Yes. You should be presented with a set of multiple choice questions where the answers are each of the parties stances on the matter and at the end your vote should be divided among the parties based on how you answered the questions.

You can’t have a space with dimensions if it doesn’t exist in spacetime, so the commonplace understanding of nothingness is a space within spacetime that has nothing that we can interact with that’s interesting to us. People will say that there is nothing in the desert, but there is lots of stuff there. People will say there is nothing in a room, but there is still air. People will say there is nothing in space but there are still diffuse atoms, gravity, radiation and virtual particles. If your definition of nothingness is that there is a space with dimensions and time that has absolutely nothing in, then yes that does not exist.

I have learned to just accept it and go with the flow. If I get bored and move on, that’s fine. If I never go back to the thing I paid a lot of money for, that’s fine. Making rules about these things for myself never increased my enjoyment or happiness.

Ugh, that’s awful. I would try a new GP.

Why don’t you try be a little less horrible? OP is sharing their life stories with us. Be nice.

True, I didn’t actually answer the question. I suppose it’s because yes, I am a tech person. I am a senior systems engineer and software developer with a career of over 20 years. I have run my own tech company for 10 of those years, and recently went back to work in a corporate setting as lead developer for a contact center software company.

It depends on the community, but in general people on Lemmy love FOSS. The linux community is very helpful and friendly (although headstrong). Moderation depends on your instance (.ml is quite politically motivated). Privacy on the platform is non existent due to how the software works, but in general, people here do care about privacy related topics.

Hello my ADHD amigo! I see you have been taken care of quite well by the other comments. You guys are all awesome.

But yeah it’s just a reverse proxy that you need and most common is nginx or apache to implement it.

You have made some positive improvements, and that’s great! But I guess that if you have ADHD then after some homeostasis has taken place, you will notice some symptoms creeping back in.

OP has established that they are being safe and working within their docs guidelines.

Thanks for the info

I would like to point out that linking to other social media is against the community rules and also by the vote count this doesn’t seem too popular.

This is interesting. I think I do this.

This is a job that I do for my gf as a act of affection. She sits on the edge of the bed or the couch and I blow dry and brush her hair. She also could not stand the boredom of this act. When I had long hair myself I never blow dried it. I guess that hippy look I was going for didn’t need a hair dryer.

FP1 was great

Nothing has been removed

Yup. Business logic for things that cost millions or billions should not be run by an approximation machine.