If they think women are equal then who can they default to thinking their better than after a hard day? I guess there’s still minorities.

It makes it more possible but still proves nothing.

According to another comment this is sexualizing men and bad.

What did it actually say?

So poetic, how did I not see it

Stubb’s in Utah is horrible about this. I was shocked at how often this happens

Sure, we did lots of things for a long time. We used to send mail instead of phone calls too. But the reality is Amazon is going to offer a bigger selection, with more convenience, usually cheaper prices, and the ability to see reviews of the product. It’s got a lot of merits that make it attractive.

And they spelled “genocide” wrong in their user name… Almost like English isn’t their first language, maybe Russian is?

Legit sad

The concept of Her is feeling more and more possible.

You’re not a shower (showwer?) you’re a grower.

Honestly seems like the better deal. Have that thing out of the way during day to day.

Golden? Only if they’re into that kind thing

I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not…

k

Telling me what I do and don’t realize is insulting. It would be like me saying you don’t realize that you’re possibly hurting millions of people so you can keep a moral high ground.

I don’t care about ideology and dogmatic shit like that. I care about facts and logic. And the hard fact is Harris or Trump will be president. That’s fact. You can rationalize all you want but you have a choice between the two, and a chance to impact the outcome but are choosing not to. This is the trolly problem where you sit back and watch the randomized switch because you’re against killing people. You could choose the rail that would cause less suffering and are choosing a third option that has no impact. I don’t get why this concept is so hard to understand.

I will help people, because there are people dying and suffering from other things. Neither myself or you will be able to stop The US from assisting in genocide. That’s a hard fact. But what I can do is help those other people. What real impact are you having? If you vote for 3rd party your vote have 0 impact, you help no one, it literally does nothing.

So your response is to insult me and tell me to fix everything? I can see I’m dealing with a true scholar here.

I’m simply pointing out that you can have an impact on the outcome or not. You don’t have to like that reality, I don’t, the it doesn’t make it anyb less true.

You’re ignoring the reality that someone who supports genocide is going to be president. I don’t like it either but that’s the reality. Now you can look at other issues and try to help other areas, it you can vote for someone who won’t get elected and therefore won’t be able to help anyone. And voting for someone who won’t win, in the end, is the same as not voting, it has no impact on the outcome. Again, I hate our system but right now that’s the reality. I would rather help those in can than have my morals be so rigid that I help no one.

Or you acknowledge more than one issue exists and the way issues are handled isn’t binary. One can be “better” on some issues or “not as worse” on others that also impact you.

Doesn’t make you putting words in their mouth any less dishonest. Or are you of a mind that people can say and do anything if they think the ends justify it?