Potato salad number of times.
Potato salad number of times.
*record scratch*
🎶Go on, take the money and run 🎶
I think that’s acceptable Brit speak tbh.
Kingdom of Heaven
Nice pitchfork.
Why now, FBI?
I don’t know how we are supposed to just think “oh what a co-inky-dink”. Maybe I’m missing some timeline stuff here but I keep seeing DOJ action based on unsealed FBI stuff. Great, but when was it sealed? They probably have sealed documents that say the sky is blue too.
Edit: ok then. It’s just asking why we see action now when we’ve all know it for a long time. Carry on.
FEED ME, SEYMOUR.
Discovery is full of shows all about people looking for things but not discovering them.
…and thirdly whether or not Trump wins in November the shares will be worthless.
Either it’s a soon a social network based on a former candidate or it’s one that I imagine a president has to distance himself from.
Either way I can see why people don’t want to invest, even the evil greedy unethical ones.
After a brief maintenance, the above comment has also also also been consumed by AI for training purposes.
*cough* EverQuest Next *cough*
It’s the office they want, not him. He’ll be removed after regardless. If America lets them.
We are Lemmy, we were on Reddit.
I think of them like swear words. Not on-the-internet swearing, but public swearing. To use their full power, words like “fuck” need context and - more importantly - discretion and frugal usage.
Overuse of emojis is even easier and harder to look at. But when used right, they serve a purpose. Otherwise it’s “Why the fuck do users fucking dislike the fucking use of emojis on fucking Lemmy?”
I think discussion is fine. I think the article fosters discussion. I also completely agree with them sidelining what could give the Republicans ammo and votes in this critical time.
But I’m just a Canadian who hates headline gore and want to point out that:
Harris isn’t pushing Medicare for All anymore. Progressives say that’s OK.
Is a shitty headline. It doesn’t match the tone or even fully the bias of the article and is click baity at best. It instantly paints the discussion for headline readers and article for the clickers as contrarian.
Harris isn’t pushing Medicare for All anymore. Is that OK?
Is what a headline should look like in this case and would probably foster discussion and less downvotes. But one can’t even tell shitty journalism from manipulation these days, can we?
Edit: whipped out my black highlighter for some bolding.
Unpopular opinion time, but hardly any. They leave me alone for the most part since I got old and all the bugs are gone and I just live and let live unless they’re also around a less… oddly benevolent and susceptible… family member.
As counterpoint, I grew up as an outdoorsy person in northern BC, I know skeeters and have probably killed more than many downvoters could imagine except Manitobans.
Maybe someone should warn the countries supplying Russia too, you fucking fiend.
Day 1,170: Why must my password taunt me so.
Chicken shit NBC. Further normalizing abhorrence in leaders by omission.
Kingdom of Heaven
Contact
LOTR
Pulp Fiction