My grandmother said, “The time for tarts are when they’re passing.” She meant “take what’s offered when its offered,” but I want it printed on the programs at my funeral
My grandmother said, “The time for tarts are when they’re passing.” She meant “take what’s offered when its offered,” but I want it printed on the programs at my funeral
Like it or not, porn is free speech. Porn and sex work in general are also usually the first lost battles in the war for free speech in any new conversational platform. First they come for the sex workers.
I’m in bed with a fractured wrist and an opoid intolerance/allergy. Where can I learn more about the dominant pain systems/different solutions you mentioned?
Something about this move makes me feel like he was bragging to somebody about how he managed to own a single letter domain, and his conversation ended up somehow here, with him doubling down on what wasn’t even a good joke to begin with.
This is purely speculative, obviously, but it just makes me think it’s him putting his money where his mouth is to save face to someone else (who is likely bemused at best)
They meant “Ohio is boring and there is nothing to do there,” I believe
If I’m telling someone else how long a drive will be, I tell them the drive time without stops. If I’m telling someone how long a drive is/was for me personally, I’ll include time for stops and note how many times I stopped along the way, for context
That’s a mother then, not a MILF trope
“My flatmate is over the hill…” “…because I’m not retired…” “At his age…”
YTA for the condescending way you talk about him. Why, because he has the audacity to be older than you and take something that is important seriously?
INFO: why did she jump to the assumption that you were pranking her? Have you pulled pranks, jokes, teases, funny asides, or anything adjacent prior to this?
NTA or NAH. It’s reasonable to want to spend time with your partner. Communication is key, especially if there are any underlying conversations that gavent been addressed or resolved
Incorrect, but I understand the spirit of your argument.
In the adult industry, it doesn’t matter if the age of consent in a certain state is under 18. 18 USC 2257 dictates that no minors can appear in porn and as either a result of that or out of fear of persuction for obscenity law, no US made/distributed porn can legally depict a character having sex who is under 18. State laws are irrelevant, as are laws outside the US, generally, because US distribution is key for sales
That’s conceptually different. You’re taking about why society approves of regarding age differences in dating.
This post is addressing the nuances in legality and plot lines in porn
But you can’t depict a child in a porno, which is the specific case I’m speaking to here. I don’t disagree with you, generally
For me personally? Turns out about 27:20 or 34:21, but individual anecdotes are not good data points
This is precisely the context I was speaking to
*She, and they are very rarely implied in porn unless it’s in the context of finishing/boarding/imaginary 18+ young adult school.
Pornographers who are above board in any way at all wouldn’t dress a set to imply there is a minor present
I’m focusing on MILF plots in porn specifically, where if the woman is a mother of an infant, they couldn’t ever (nor would they, should they, would anyone want them to) show her with her child as a maternal figure in that role
If gold were a thing here, I would give it to you
Instead of Reddit Gold, may I offer you Lemmy Cold 🧊 ?
Exactly!