• brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    :) good point. Can be a nice reality warp, for the non-super commuters who can enjoy the weather by the Bay/Pacific.

    Edited in an obvious miss:

    Edit: I forgot, the argument could easily be “the vast majority of high earners got there by job hopping”!

    Luck really helps too. Pretty much a necessity.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      A good point on the luck aspect, and you reminded me of the fact that people who already have money have “better luck” in the respect that they have more opportunities to try new things.

      It’s like one of those carnival games where you throw darts at balloons. Middle-class kids might get one or two darts while wealthy kids get 10. And the poor kids are the ones working at the carnival.

      Something like 20% of businesses fail in their first year, and 80% are gone by year 5. If you can afford to start 5 different businesses, your odds of one surviving long enough to get bought up by Google or something are much better than somebody who put their life savings into their company.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Absolutely!

        We built some proof for the darts phenomenon in an economics class. Professor gave everyone a certain number of pieces of candy. Everyone was allowed to trade for a while, then we counted candy at the end. (Might’ve been stipulations on how trades worked, can’t recall). As you’d imagine, any kid who started with 10 pieces of candy ended with more candy than any kid who started with 3 pieces. Powerful example 🍭