Oh they did

Bummer if it’s due to deprivation of rights so not sharing photo

May need to use Enhance

… Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the most expensive air travel system in the world, yet we rank poorly in customer satisfaction and on-time performance. United is one of the largest airlines in the US, behind only American and Delta in fleet size. It has grown and grown, …

Ctrl + Alt + Arrow key

Inverting screens for lulz

Missed Fill My Crack In too

Someone up thread brought up that someone in a position such as a health care CEO can cause a tremendous amount more of suffering than death row inmates might have caused. That is an interesting point.

It has also crossed my mind that if, once a week, the richest person on the planet were killed, eventually fear would outweigh greed, and remaining folks of extraordinary means would be likely to be pushed toward justice.

And yet…

I am not a killer. I live in a country where I don’t want to see the kind of assassinations I read about abroad. I want the rule of law to prevail. I’m cognizant that if a movement took off where powerful, “evil” people were killed, there would probably be an opposite reaction that could lead to snowballing violence.

Overall, this is a complex subject. Reasonable arguments can be made and supported by various ethical frameworks. I imagine good people are likely to experience cognitive dissonance when reading this news.

tl;dr murder bad, fairness & widespread prosperity good

Yayyyyy Bitwarden!!!

Ha we English plenty good enough too with our checks & our checkings & all

Disposable income freedom fighting Lemmings, be advised!

Donate

That actually is how they would spell it in English in Vietnam, huh?

It’s not like any of us want life to be made so difficult when we’re billionaires either

Yup - eerbody switched to:

bitwarden.com

Not sure if the recent open source concerns are still… of concern

Less/fewer problem here

As offensive to my sensibilities as hocus-pocus may be, a question that requires me to be competent enough to use a search engine to derive the answer to their question may be acceptable in some cases… But I rather doubt it is acceptable in this instance.

If part of the intent is to dissuade those who do not have a basic grasp of language or problem solving skills, then it seems the mission is accomplished. But I wonder if it’s entirely ADA* compliant.

*Americans With Disabilities Act, here in the states

I believe the graphic was uncharacteristically low quality (for the BBC?), which is why looking for the original source today, you’ll only find archive links. Because the original illustration was quickly replaced.

Wow there was an exact GIF for that!

Gaslighting is all fun and games until you do it after a third toot

I kinda feel like we failed here

Well I guess not us, but greedy people. It’s hard to imagine a more well-educated populace being this dumb. And it’s hard to imagine us not being better educated in a world with less greed.

We can’t guarantee the person setting up the form designed it properly. A business requirement to only hire those who chose yes may have been implemented as a technical requirement to actually choose yes on the form.