• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean this is just hilarious to me. Don’t trust their billionaire corporate oligarchs, trust our billionaire corporate oligarchs.

    The news comes a day after the House voted 352-65 on a bipartisan measure to force Beijing-based ByteDance to find a U.S. buyer for TikTok within six months,

    Can we do the same to break Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon up?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, but US legislators are trying to force it to enrich their rich buddies for “national security”.

    • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s sort of similar, but the US government isn’t seizing TikTok. It, when the legislation is signed, will force sale to a US entity or otherwise prevent the usage in the United States.

      ByteDance will probably get somewhat close to fair market value for the application, after all of the lawsuits and legal challenges are over with

      • fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        ByteDance will probably get somewhat close to fair market value for the application

        No it won’t.

        The amount of power Tiktok has is priceless, which is exactly why Americans spread so much FUD to put that power in the hands of their rulers.

        • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          If power is priceless, then they’re going to get a screaming deal because I’m willing to bet that some company is going to offer several hundreds of millions for TikTok.

          I get what you’re saying though. As far as I know, this decision is a first of its kind for the US. They’ve usually used laws and government contracts to influence things like data processing and storage locations for companies handling things like PII and financial information. Forcing local ownership is honestly more in line with something that China would do which is a little ironic.

          • Nurgle@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Add a zero to that, no way tiktok would sell for anything less than several billion. Facebook paid $1B for Insta over 12 years when the app had around 25 million users.