• jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    True!

    Reminds me of other industries that have immunity against being sued in court.

    Companies also try to make it seem for the workers, if you sue company, that they have to be handled internally (scare tatic?).

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The latter would be an arbitration agreement, and unfortunately I think they’re enforceable. They make you sign an contract waiving your rights and agreeing to arbitration.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re considered generally enforceable.

          https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/08/the-enforceability-of-employment-arbitration-agreements/

          On May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court, in a long-awaited decision, held that employment arbitration agreements with class action waivers requiring individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), notwithstanding Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”), which protects employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities.

          But they might not be. Sure, if I had some case related to this I would get legal advice.

          https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/practical-guidance-journal/b/pa/posts/drafting-enforceable-arbitration-agreements-hottest-issue-in-contract-law

          Arbitration agreements are supposed to ensure that disputes are resolved outside of court, and that’s why it’s an irony of almost cosmic proportions that “the enforceability of arbitration agreements is likely ‘the single most litigated contractual issue’ today

          https://www.natlawreview.com/article/ties-bind-you-arbitration-agreement-enforceable-and-binding

          But are they enforceable?

          The answer, fortunately, is yes, but it is important to keep in mind the most basic characteristic of arbitration agreements - they are contracts. Both Federal and State laws foster a strong policy favoring arbitration, but each provides that the enforceability of agreements requiring arbitration for work-related disputes will be determined by applicable state law regarding contract principles.
          The majority of published case law suggests that arbitration agreements are most commonly challenged on the basis that they lack mutuality of contract, lack adequate consideration for the contract, or are unconscionable. These tripping blocks can be avoided by drafting a carefully-worded arbitration agreement and providing employees ample notice and opportunity to review the agreement.

          The latter is why 23andMe is giving people the chance to review the new TOS first. It also is probably different for a TOS vs an employment contract.