• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The lower court’s decision was upheld. A lower court that didn’t have the issue of defendants being asked to preside over their own case.

    • m_f@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure, but do you think if the lower court decided that the case could move forward, the justices would’ve sat out? I doubt it.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do you have an example of them doing that? Or are you simply lampooning them despite them making the best decision available.