this country is so fucking cool

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let me guess: his wife caught him watching gay porn and since he is a good Christian he wants to save others from falling into the same trap? And now his wife is really proud of him?

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hey Oklahoma, clearly you have nothing to worry about Sharia law, you’re doing a great job at introducing it yourselves.

        • rjthyen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          But the differences are slight. Maybe won’t go as far down the oppression of women rabbit hole, but not for lack of trying. Merely because, I hope, our society is to far past that for them to drag us back that far.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Merely because, I hope, our society is to far past that for them to drag us back that far.

            These women in Iran just before the Islamic Revolution in 1979 probably thought they were too far past it, too.

              • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Iran. Even if the British and American interference was abhorrent, an Islamic Fascist state wasn’t the only alternative they had.

                Putting all the agency (and therefore responsibility) in imperial powers is also a form of imperialism.

              • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Iran caused that revolution. They were fed up with a leader seen as a western puppet so they replaced him with religious extremist.

      • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        We aren’t speaking Arabian. It’s like “naan bread”, sure, naan means bread but not in this language and we’ve lots of other breads…If you just say Rye a Canadian will hand you a glass of whisky not a loaf of bread.

        • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s still a bad example. We don’t say that “I drive a XYZ car” since car is implied and we can just say “I drive a XYZ”

          Check with any XYZ standing for a manufacturer like Toyota, Tesla or a model like Corolla, 911, etc.

          If there’s enough understanding of the concept, no need for clarification. Everyone knows naan is a bread. Unless you are asking a question in Japanese, just drop the bread (and law for Sharia)

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, loves talking about his creepy spy app he and his son have on their phone that alerts the other if they visit naughty sites. So the writers of this proposal and all that vote for it would be happy to put the same program on their devices and computers, right? And tie that straight to a public feed we can all see? Great Great.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        See when I read this story it isn’t really that bad.

        They believe porn is bad and use the app to keep each other accountable. I don’t really have an issue with that. You do you.

        But when they start trying to enforce that view through the government it’s obviously not okay.

        • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Aside from it being creepy as hell to do that with your son (who probably didn’t have a say in the matter) this is a massive national security risk. Spyware on a Congress member’s phone? Not a great idea.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m imagining they have government issued phones and private phones. The government issued one for sure wouldn’t be allowed to have that shit on it.

            • GTKashi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              That sounds reasonable and so it’s probably not even remotely close to what actually happens.

              • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                The craziest thing about the Hillary Clinton private email server was not that she had it, but that her predecessors also used private email for government stuff as Secretary of State. Not a one-off, but the norm. Absolutely nuts.

            • meco03211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Can you imagine that IT request?

              “In having trouble installing this app on my phone. It’s so my phone can be remotely monitored to make sure I’m not looking at porn.”

              “Could you just not try to look at porn on that phone?”

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                “Sir, you have a federal government IT department. Which federal agency do you want to tell your family if you watch porn? Don’t worry they already monitor your personal devices too.”

    • Xhieron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      My money says this guy can’t even close his closet door anymore for all the skeletons.

  • Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s no way that dude is not railing twinks every weekend.

    I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but his doubtless moral hypocrisy is rustling like a loud chip bag in the movies.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everyone involved in pushing this law should be barred from working in government, and fined for wasting our time.

    • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just let them pass it then search their browser history. You know the only reason they’re so concerned about it is they’re ball’s deep into it.

  • The Liver@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    FREEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOM 🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🍟🍟🍟🍟🍟🍟

  • ryan213@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s take bets on who’s getting caught first! Drag queens or some god-fearing dude??

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t pretend for a second itll actually be enforced against the in group

  • FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honestly asking for second opinions: Looking at the report of the actual proposal, it seems to only target sexual content containing people under 18? Am I missing something?

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Honestly asking for second opinions: Looking at the report of the actual proposal, it seems to only target sexual content containing people under 18? Am I missing something?

      Based on a picture in the article of the first page of the law as its written, it seems to be modifying/enhancing an existing law that currently only affects minors, broadening it so that it covers all ages, and under new additional rules. IANAL.

    • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Calm down, Carl. Some of us already live here and would prefer it if he didn’t make it worse thanks.

        • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s Texas in my case, but in 5 years, the date my wife qualifies to retire with her full state (teachers) pension, we are getting the fuck out of here.