• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s even funnier to me is how people will full on rage when someone brings up female genital mutilation while in the same breath saying circumcision is fine

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The main problem is that people tend to intuitively think of the least invasive form of male circumcision and the most horrific form of female genital mutilation.

      For both genders, all kinds of forms exist

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        the least invasive form of male circumcision

        Is what’s in these discussions.

        the most horrific form of female genital mutilation.

        Is there any other kind in regular discussion? When people refer to FGM, they’re not talking about labiaplasty (which would be a more appropriate comparison).

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          labiaplasty (which would be a more appropriate comparison).

          How are you coming to this conclusion?

          The foreskin has more nerve endings than the glans, and double that of the clitoris. The labia in contrast has much fewer nerve endings, which is why sexual stimulation is not easily accomplished with simply stimulating the labia. Possible? Yes. But not nearly to the same degree as clitoral stimulation.

          Edit: Given the lack of elaboration, I’ll have to assume the conclusions reached by a gut reaction of “skin is skin” which is not at all how this works.

        • Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          A labiaplasty is not equivalent to removal of the foreskin. It would be like removing the clitoral hood. Educate yourself before sharing your thoughts please.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Dude, yeah. It’s so weird.

      I refused circumcision for my son (25 years ago, US hospital), and had to remind the staff several times because it was just assumed it would be done. I stopped them 3 times during different shifts when they were about to take him from our room for the procedure.

      Then when it came up in conversation when he was an infant, people would say to me ‘you should have done it’, because he would get infections (he never did), or he’d be bullied in gym showers (he never did to my knowledge), or whatever. My take was it should be his decision, not mine.

      The pressure was really intense, though. It’s weird how interested people can be in someone else’s infant’s penis. We’ve never talked about it, but reading stories from other men, I assume he’s happy being uncut, and I’m glad I didn’t do it.

      e: for anyone reading this days later, I did ask my son for his opinion prompted by this conversation, mostly because of responses I got elsewhere in this thread that made me question my decision:

      Me: Hey man, so feel free not to answer this if it’s too personal, but I was having a debate about circumcision and another parent challenged me saying I’d made the wrong decision. So yes/no/I don’t want to talk about it cuz that’s weird, do you regret my decision?

      Son: I don’t, and none of my partners have, either. I only get thumbs up and compliments. I hope that wasn’t too personal.

      Me: Not at all. Thank you for giving me your and your partners’ review!

      So yeah, it’s not just my assumptions. And no regrets.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My take was it should be his decision, not mine.

        It’s not though. They’ll never be able to go back and have it done as an infant. Time machines don’t exist.

        The procedure is much, much easier as an infant than it is as a boy or teenager or adult.

        I respect whatever decision you made. There are reasons for both. But no, he didn’t have the option to go back and have it done easily.

        And sorry about the pressure. You shouldn’t have to go through that, and I hope/expect that aspect is better after 25 years.

        • Darth_Mew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          every slice and dice would be easier as an infant as you wouldn’t remember it anyway. you’re an idiot

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I actually think about the ignored psychological effects of dealing with that level of physical pain so soon after being born a lot.

            Birth is already a traumatic experience for both mother and infant. But to then immediately, with no anesthesia, cut an extremely sensitive part of the infants body off? That has to leave some kind of mental scarring.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I can actually speak to this.

              I was born with a genetic condition affecting my collagen (Ehlers Danlos), which meant my bones were overly soft and, since I was breach til moments before birth, my legs were bowed pretty severely. This was in 1971, and the treatment at that time was the doctors literally bent my legs into position manually and then braced them for my first few years. That’s not how they deal with it nowadays, because they learnt it was horribly painful.

              I don’t remember that initial experience, obviously, but my mother tells me several years later when I was a young child and having problems walking, she took me to the doctor and they finally worked out that I was in excruciating pain all the time. They asked why I hadn’t said anything and I told them it was because everyone was always in excruciating pain, but nobody else was complaining about it, so I shouldn’t either. I’d been in pain since birth, and just figured it was normal.

              That experience prevented me from getting proper care and made my early childhood hell. I still have emotional trauma from it. So yeah, early pain is not benign.