• Slatlun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    10 months ago

    ‘252 km (157 miles) range’ to save others the same skimming I did

        • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          ·
          10 months ago

          The key is that with the right use case, it frees up lithium to be used where only it is suitable.

          (for my needs I’d be fine with sodium…)

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I can see that. My point is that the only electric car that has that range in the U.S. is the Leaf, which goes 168 miles on the smaller battery. I don’t need an electric car that goes that many miles between charges. I’d be fine with 90. I’d probably be fine with less than 90. We have a second car if we ever want to leave town. I’d ditch my hybrid and get a cheaper electric car that didn’t have a huge range, but it isn’t even on offer.

            • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              For sure! I think we’re going to have to move away from a one-size fits all car design. For general city use, I use a Chevy Bolt, but for longer (infrequent) runs, I’m still stuck with ICE (I’d use a hybrid if I had one). In Canada, the range really does go down in the winter. (and Canada has not taken charging infrastructure very seriously - mandatory for adoption)

              Anyway you look at it, these are very, very positive developments.

            • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              Dude get a used Leaf or Bolt. There is a $4k tax credit or direct price reduction for used now.

              • ramble81@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Got any info on that? Looking at buying out my EV lease and wonder if I can get that added.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              My problem is that I need >100 mile range. I live in a cold climate and have a 50 mile, round-trip commute (and high speed, so even worse range), so if EVs get half the range in the winter, I could stuck. There isn’t a big set of cars in the 100-150 mile range, usually you get something older and used with <100, or current cars get >200 and you pay the price for it.

              A new Leaf is something like $30k, and used Leafs are something like $17k, so it’s absolutely not worth replacing my reliable hybrid car at that price. If I could get a new car around $20k with ~150 mile range, or a used car (~5 years old) with 100-150 mile range for 10k, I’d probably buy it. But that just isn’t a thing right now. So I’m waiting.

    • tills13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve found people vastly overstated how much range they need. 99% of usage is in the city between home and somewhere else. 250km is perfect if the price is right.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Exactly. We have two cars, and we only need one to have any kind of range. The other is fine with 250km/150mi range, but it needs to be relatively inexpensive to buy and repair. It’ll just be for a daily commute and around-town driving, no expectation for long-distance.

        It doesn’t need space for people or stuff, just 2-4 passengers is plenty. It’ll strictly be for commutes and small trips to the grocery store and whatnot, the other car can be used for larger trips.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s not bad if the price is right.

      I’d be willing to buy one for ~$5-8k.

  • Newtra@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is awesome news. Not because of the car, but because it builds the supply lines for an alternative battery chemistry.

    People have been using lithium-ion batteries for home and grid storage, which is nuts if you compare it to other battery types. Lithium is expensive and polluting and only makes sense if you’re limited by weight & space. Cheaper batteries, even if they’re bigger/heavier, will do wonders to the economics of sustainable electricity production.

    • You999@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      People have been using lithium-ion batteries for home and grid storage, which is nuts if you compare it to other battery types

      Compared to other battery chemistry types using lithium makes tons of sense.

      Lead acid type batteries like sealed and AGM are cheap but not power dense and do not offer the same discharge ability that lithium offers without damaging the battery (AGM fixes this but it’s still an issue). Some lead acid batteries require continuous maintenance and vent toxic gasses which may be an issue depending on your encloser.

      Nickel cadmium batteries solve a lot of issues that lead acid batteries are plagued with however they suffer from moisture intrusion issues causing self discharge. Nickel cadmium also suffers from memory effect which may completely ruin pour battery depending on your use. The elephant in the room with nickel cadmium is that it’s banned in some countries including the European union due to how toxic cadmium is.

      Now with lithium, it’s a very energy dense battery which means you need less batteries to meet a capacity or you can fit more capacity into an encloser. There isn’t any electrolyte or water maintenance you need to worry about. You can discharge and recharge as you wish with minimal damage. Really the only downsides is that they do not like charging in the cold, are just as toxic as cadmium, and are much much much more expensive.

        • You999@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The original comment was about lithium and their popularity for backup power. Sodium ion batteries are so new that you can’t purchase them yet (blueitte supposedly released the NA300 but I can’t find any in stock and it’s no longer on their site).

          It wouldn’t be fair to compare a chemistry you cannot purchase and which it’s strengths and weaknesses haven’t been tested outside of controlled laboratory testing.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Probably because they’re new and the parent comment specifically referred to the cheaper, less energy dense battery types.

      • Newtra@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I agree that older commercialized battery types aren’t so interesting, but my point was about all the battery types that haven’t had enough R&D yet to be commercially mass-produced.

        Power grids don’t care much about density - they can build batteries where land is cheap, and for fire control they need to artificially space out higher-density batteries anyway. There are heaps of known chemistries that might be cheaper per unit stored (molten salt batteries, flow batteries, and solid state batteries based on cheaper metals), but many only make sense for energy grid applications because they’re too big/heavy for anything portable.

        I’m saying it’s nuts that lithium ion is being used for cases where energy density isn’t important. It’s a bit like using bottled water on a farm because you don’t want to pay to get the nearby river water tested. It’s great that sodium ion could bring new economics to grid energy storage, but weird that the only reason it got developed in the first place was for a completely different industry.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Really the only downsides is that they do not like charging in the cold, are just as toxic as cadmium, and are much much much more expensive.

        Seems like some pretty big and numerous downsides lmao

      • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Don’t forget the volatility of Lithium batteries if they ever get damaged or punctured.

    • profdc9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lithium makes more sense when weight is an issue, for example when you have to carry the battery around. Sodium batteries could be good for grid storage if they can be implemented as scale cheaply enough, especially using common materials.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Used car batteries can be reused for storage, so it’s going to require a cost analysis to determine what makes most sense for storage solutions. It’s great if they can use a cheaper sodium battery but we also don’t want to just waste the second hand lithium batteries. It makes sense to use both. At least until there are better recycling options. Also with solid state batteries hopefully coming up soon, it’ll still make sense to find use for the current batteries.

          Ideally, home backups should be able to use any battery. Standards for compatibility would be nice.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        A quick wikipedia read implies that sodium-ion batteries could be half or less the cost vs lithium. Also this:

        Another factor is that cobalt, copper and nickel are not required for many types of sodium-ion batteries, and more abundant iron-based materials work well in Na+ batteries.

        That’s probably most of why it’s cheaper, and it’s also way less damaging to the environment if they truly can be made from mostly sodium and iron.

        I’m more concerned about the safety aspects. It seems there are two main types:

        • aqueous - quite safe, but also likely very heavy per unit of energy
        • carbon - high risk (probably similar to lithium)

        That’s a big reason why I and probably many others aren’t interested in the current batch of EVs. Yeah they’re pretty safe, but they’re quite violent when they fail. I’d probably buy a sodium-ion EV if it could get 100-150 miles range reliably. That would be absolutely sufficient for my commute, even in the winter, and it would make a fantastic “around town” car when I’m not working.

        • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

          Sodium-ion batteries (NIBs, SIBs, or Na-ion batteries) are several types of rechargeable batteries, which use sodium ions (Na+) as its charge carriers. In some cases, its working principle and cell construction are similar to those of lithium-ion battery (LIB) types, but it replaces lithium with sodium as the cathode material. Sodium belongs to the same group in the periodic table as lithium and thus has similar chemical properties. In other cases (such as aqueous Na-ion batteries) they are quite different from Li-ion batteries. SIBs received academic and commercial interest in the 2010s and early 2020s, largely due to the uneven geographic distribution, high environmental impact, and high cost of lithium. An obvious advantage of sodium is its natural abundance, particularly in saltwater. Another factor is that cobalt, copper and nickel are not required for many types of sodium-ion batteries, and more abundant iron-based materials work well in Na+ batteries. This is because the ionic radius of Na+ (116 pm) is substantially larger than that of Fe2+ and Fe3+ (6992 pm depending on the spin state), whereas the ionic radius of Li+ is similar (90 pm). Similar ionic radii of lithium and iron result in their mixing in the cathode material during battery cycling, and a resultant loss of cyclable charge. A downside of the larger ionic radius of Na+ is a slower intercalation kinetics of sodium-ion electrode materials.The development of Na+ batteries started in the 1990s. After three decades of development, NIBs are at a critical moment of commercialization. Several companies such as HiNa and CATL in China, Faradion in the United Kingdom, Tiamat in France, Northvolt in Sweden, and Natron Energy in the US, are close to achieving the commercialization of NIBs, with the aim of employing sodium layered transition metal oxides (NaxTMO2), Prussian white (a Prussian blue analogue) or vanadium phosphate as cathode materials.Electric vehicles using sodium-ion battery packs are not yet commercially available. However, CATL, the world's biggest lithium-ion battery manufacturer, announced in 2022 the start of mass production of SIBs. In February 2023, the Chinese HiNA Battery Technology Company, Ltd. placed a 140 Wh/kg sodium-ion battery in an electric test car for the first time, and energy storage manufacturer Pylontech obtained the first sodium-ion battery certificate from TÜV Rheinland.

          article | about

    • ___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not just that, we don’t have enough lithium deposits atm to build enough lithium evs to last more than a few decades if we act smart (which we generally do not).

    • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cheaper batteries, even if they’re bigger/heavier

      Yes, just what we need is more vehicles on the road that weigh as much as a tank but accelerate like a Ferrari. I’m sure that won’t cause any problems.

  • AClassyGentleman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    10 months ago

    Curious how it’ll perform in real world conditions. Sodium batteries are supposed to have much better charging times and don’t degrade the way lithium batteries do, both of which would be huge. Fingers crossed they live up to expectations.

    (Also obligatory “expand and improve public transit damnit!”)

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      As some used to “gotchas” and things aren’t free, I’m wondering what kind of shortcomings[1] these batteries have that others do not.

      [1] for example acid batteries can push a lot of power, but they are heavy and contain lead and well… acid. The nickel cadmium doesn’t contain lead and acid, but has memory so you should follow discharge them before charging again. They are lighter, but still not light. Lithium ion are light, don’t have memory, but can explode, also lose life if they are kept fully discharged or charged for long periods of time. They also slowly discharge when not in use, mainly due to protective circuit needing electricity to run.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Their only downside is having a little less energy density than lithium ion ones. You need a larger battery for the same capacity basically. Everything else is a positive - they are even non-flammable and the materials to make them are abundant and easy to obtain.

    • theblueredditrefugee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      expand and improve public transit dammit!

      Currently living in Shenzhen and you’d be surprised that you can actually have it both ways. You can get around via transit quite easily, but also driving isn’t too difficult. The problem with US cities is mostly just single family homes, which waste a bunch of space. If everything is less dense, you have to drive further to get to where you want to go, and building public transit makes less sense since it needs to service more areas to reach the same amount of people

  • Slovene@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    My doctor says I can’t buy it. Is there a low sodium version?

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Any new battery technology news needs to be taken with a grain of salt. They are highly likely over-hyped and the actually realized products will have more problems than the current established tech initially.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      10 months ago

      Any new battery technology news needs to be taken with grain of salt.

      Well yeah, it’s sodium.

    • roscoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Normally you’re right. It seems like every day there is a new revolutionary battery tech with no real estimate when it’ll ever be in use. But in this case, according to the article, deliveries will start next month which means they’re already in production.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure. I’m in no rush to replace my car with one of these, but it’s a great thing that this technology is already in production. With these actually going into real cars that people can buy and drive, we’ll get more data so that any serious issues will hopefully be identified and addressed in the next generation.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wait how is this the first? Didn’t the th!nk city have a molten sodium battery years ago?