• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So the article explains that official tournaments use a unique words list that contains a lot of generous words like “zzz” and “aa”. Mostly intended to allow high scoring words for people who studied their list.

    The company that maintains the list has added a lot more of these “not a real word but it scores high so we added it” words.

    For some highlight words from the article: MIREPOIXS, HORSEFEATHERSES, SUBSPECIESES, GRATINEEED

    Players are complaining that high level tournaments are basically going to be competitions for who knows the most gibberish from the tournament word list and it is alienating the general population from joining tournaments and scrabble clubs.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t the official word list just be the dictionary? Isn’t that the point?

      • CubbyTustard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it is, the scrabble dictionary. a dictionary is just a collection of words there are hundreds of kinds. most house rules for scrabble require the word to be in a dictionary that’s actually in the house or a pre-agreed on one online but at a tournament whose dictionary do you use? Well the scrabble tournament holders made their own and then modify that for local languages and such.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Something about it just seems to miss the point of the game. You would think their dictionary would be cut down to include commonly known words mixed in with some eccentric ones. If anything, to prevent a situation like this where tournament players are just memorizing gobbledygook for points. Seems like it muttles the fun.

          • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only good way to play scrabble is by adding the rule that you must play the funniest word you can make.

            • Breezy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have had the most fun when i used to play with categories for double points. Having to explain why such and such belongs is half the fun.

      • loudambiance@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which dictionary? Merriam Webster added almost 700 “words” this year, including shit like: TTYL, finsta, bussin, cromulent, doggo, simp, goated, and more. I feel like they are slowly becoming urbandictionary.com.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, their job is to provide definitions for the words people use in language, not to gatekeep what words are “good enough” to be defined.

          I hear each of the words you’ve listed all the time, they’re part of our language whether we like it or not.

          • loudambiance@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            My point was more about which dictionary do you use and less about the exact words added. Webster added them, but Oxford and American Heritage didn’t.

              • kakes@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Now I want to play a game of scrabble where you play a complete nonsense word, and your points are the number of Google results for that word - lowest points wins. And maybe you have 5 letters instead of 7.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I would rather be able to spell out bussin’ for points than zzzz, aaa, or Mieropoix. At least it is a word people actually use in conversation.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mirepoix is an ordinary word in cooking, but it’s an uncountable noun and they’re inventing a fake plural, like “featherses”.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Didnt it specifically say horsefeatherses in one of those comments? I start drawing the line there.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Modern dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive. They don’t tell you how things should be spelled, or what meaning they should have. Instead, they report how things are spelled and what people think they mean in the real world.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure the tournaments are just memorising lists. A man won the French competition without being able to speak French… He just memorised the accepted words.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Words in scrabble should be things that people actually use outside scrabble. It’s fair if that makes some leeway for slang. It’s also fair if it means that some really obscure words that nobody really uses get in. But, this seems over the line because they’re taking words that nobody uses, and tacking on un-grammatical endings.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m fine with adding slightly offensive words like ‘twat’ and ‘redneck’, but fake plurals like ‘feceses’ and ‘rouxes’ are absurd rules-lawyering.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I vote games like scrabble don’t use made up words just because they can give you big points. In that case why not just allow your players to place down all their letters in any random order and call it legal? It scores more points, so why not, Big Scrabble?

    Also, I’m also personally against the use of made up slang words that started appearing around the 2010s and are now in common use, or at least were in common use.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the point is rather that all words are made up. For the record you have my vote as well. I don’t want nonsense words to be a part of the game, especially at tournament level.

  • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So the group re-added words such as SPAZ, GOY, REDNECK, GREYBEARD, and TWAT.

    Great, he’s back…

  • XbSuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, my opinion that scrabble is one of the worst games ever made is now solidified.

  • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of these additions are just silliness. That said, I could barely make it through the article, as it kept just randomly starting a new sentence halfway through a thought.

    It also referenced somebody, but then didn’t finish the sentence before moving on to talk about someone else. I have been annoyed by all the “this article was written by an ai” comments I’ve been seeing lately. Having read this article I see what people mean.