• tun@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t expect the last act of the user. Simply amazing.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fix implemented: user given apron and replacement cake.

      There’s a certain point where you just shrug and give up.

      • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes you just have to accept that the problem exists between the keyboard and chair and work around it.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And then he drops it into his lap. After all that struggle, he drops it into his lap.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shit take: If you dont make the UI dummy proof then its the programmers fault not the user

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another counterpoint: When you start implementing all that dummy proofing, you make the software more and more tedious to work with for people who know what they’re doing.

      I think it’s quite obviously an issue that needs balance. Some software is meant to be seamless to get started with, so that users can get something done once in a while, some software is meant to be used long-term by professionals and requires productivity. And yet, many people jump on anything they don’t immediately understand as bad UX.

    • h3rm17@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s literally impossible. I’ve seen programs ask three times to confirm a deletion, with big warnings, really emphasized. Saying it’s permanent all three times.

      Then the fuckers contacted us at tech support and go all like “hurr durr I just deleted my project can I have it back”.

      NO YOU LITTLE DIPSHIT YOU CANNOT. We did have backups though, most of the time (if it was recent) but it took well over a couple hours to properly restore, so we only did it if they asked nicely and behaved.

      TL;DR People are stupid, no such thing as dump proofing. What needs to be done is hold people to higher standards and force to educate themselves or GTFO.

      • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I feel like that anger should be directed at the people who made the software, not the people who use it.

        The foolproof solution here is to… give people the option to restore what they deleted without contacting tech support. It’s obviously needed.

        Nobody can expect anyone to read multiple warnings asking them if they’re really really sure whether they want to perform a reversible action they set out to do.

        That’s a textbook example of a poor design that breeds more people desensitized to warnings.

          • RoadArchie@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its just true. People become desensitized to warnings and ignore them. Putting three of them is an example of bad UX because at that point you need to do something else.

            • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry but people have to have a bare minimum of a awareness and understanding of the tools they use literally every day. I work in tech support, you have to stop cutting people slack at some point and make sure they understand it’s their fault.

        • h3rm17@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What if we cannot afford the space of keeping everything backed uo forever? What if it has been a year? Where do we put the limits to “okay, this is stupid” and “this is perfectably reasonable”? What if the action cannot be reversed, and after deletion you need to anonimyze particularly sensitive data?

          I say to all that, READ THE FUCKING MANUAL. If you are not apt enough to read and research about the software, you are not apt enough to use it.

          Same with hardware. You cut your finger because you didnt follow instructions clearly laid out for you not to cut your finger when using a saw? Maybe sawing was not for you mate

    • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Gut-driven design. People could conduct usability tests, but neither their “data-driven” management, marketing, design, nor the development department care about that since it’s only “worthless” “additional” workload. Nevermind that usability testing reveals valuable insights about the people the business is supposed to generate value for. Or that usability testing identifies flawed designs before developers write any protoype code, designers draw sketches, etc. Or that usability testing nullifies unnecessary meetings about hypothetical scenarios littered with incorrect assumptions about reality. Usability testing is undervalued.