The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSowing chaosstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down126
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1imageSowing chaosstartrek.websiteThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squaredingleberry@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up85·1 year agoIt’s “wheeled around”, not “around 99”.
minus-squarestepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyilinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 year agoOh I see I don’t know how to read. But what psychopath buys 99 phones to wheel them around and doesn’t buy the 100th one?
minus-squareGeek_King@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI love the idea of Reverse OCD, thank you stranger.
minus-square0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month ago*ICD, reverse OCD isn’t a thing and I could totally see someone doing 99 instead of 100 due to OCD
minus-squareReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agohe used the 100th one to take the picture
minus-squarerailsdev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down5·1 year agoIt’s a poor choice of words for the headline; I oftentimes misinterpret unclear headlines like this and it drives me nuts.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoIt’s not really unclear. One does not “wheel” a phone, and “around 99” makes no sense with such a precise value. And it’s not even funny misinterpreted so awkwardly.
It’s “wheeled around”, not “around 99”.
Oh I see I don’t know how to read. But what psychopath buys 99 phones to wheel them around and doesn’t buy the 100th one?
Someone with reverse OCD?
I love the idea of Reverse OCD, thank you stranger.
*ICD, reverse OCD isn’t a thing and I could totally see someone doing 99 instead of 100 due to OCD
he used the 100th one to take the picture
It’s a poor choice of words for the headline; I oftentimes misinterpret unclear headlines like this and it drives me nuts.
It’s not really unclear. One does not “wheel” a phone, and “around 99” makes no sense with such a precise value. And it’s not even funny misinterpreted so awkwardly.