• Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      TAYLOR SWIFT WE NEED YOU! WHERE ARE YOU? DON’T LEAVE US WE NEED HELP!

      This is obviously tounge in check but it feels closer to real than it should be.

    • Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      You’ll find that these professions have a vested interest in maintaining network effects, and as such will view Mast/Blue as threats to their networking infrastructure. They don’t want to dilute the importance of the platform their patronage systems rely on (let alone destroy it) - in fact its centrality is why they leverage it to advance their careers. Artists I can see understanding platform agnosticism to some extent, but for the other two groups, it’s simply not in their DNA. The gatekeeping is a feature for them.

      ‘The medium is the message’ as a Canadian theorist once said.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    I almost want to have used x, so I could quit using it and improve this statistic.

    But I never did

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        Im on Mastodon. Rarely use it because I’m no fan of the format (same reason I never got into Twitter). I do jump on and follow causes that I support that switch to it.

      • pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        That’s not how it works. They already didn’t use Twitter because it’s not useful to them, why would they use a similar service now?

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Maybe they just never bothered to try.

          Also while the platforms are similar, the users and thus the content are not just a smaller version of Twitter.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 days ago

      When I logged in about six weeks after the ownership change my feed included Elon Musk, Andrew Tate and 2-3 other right wing influencers. I follow none of these people, I have zero interest in what they have to say and I find them reprehensible. I deleted my account and haven’t used the platform since.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 days ago

        I stopped in today after months because my friend is launching a game and I wanted to give them a like and a comment. When I left Twitter my feed was just nerd shit and makers.

        When I logged in today it was several right wing advertisements at the top. When I went to search it was more Trump shit. I just wanted to support my indie friend. That’s it for me.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          I’ve just had to look out a morbid curiosity and yeah it’s all Trump. I am being encouraged to vote for Donald Trump. This is a man who is to anathema pretty much all of my beliefs, of course I’m not going to vote for him he seriously wants to be a dictator.

          Also, I’m not American so I can’t vote for him anyway.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I wonder if the right-wing content actually has increased, or if it’s just the ratio of it compared to left-wing content as much of the left has seemingly abandoned the platform.

      My feed was almost entirely non-political to begin with, and personally, I’ve hardly noticed any difference, though the little politics that do get thru tend to indeed lean right.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          18 days ago

          Right, but I don’t see how simply being on the platform makes one part of the problem.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            You’re giving them money and engagement with which to continue. Having your eyes on that content and then returning the next day to see more is explicit approval of that content. And having those ads served to you makes Elon money which he then uses to serve more ads to everyone.

            Essentially, visiting X is paying Elon real dollars directly and telling him thank you for the propaganda, may I please have another

            • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 days ago

              Adblocker works on twitter too though, and I don’t really mind Elon profiting from my use of Twitter anyway. People should be compensated for running social media platforms like twitter.

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Uh, woah there. Why the extremeist view? I’m on there pretty actively for industry chatter. What’s the problem I’m a part of?

      • croc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Yeah some niche communities that have nothing to do with extremists or politics at all are only on Twitter/X unfortunately. For example, I am into domain name investing and all my domainer friends gather on X to discuss our latest acquisitions and sales. I’ve tried to get people to move to Mastodon, but it’s difficult.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Yeah same in defi software engineering. All of crypto is on Twitter and calls it “ct” aka “crypto twitter”.

          FYI, I’m referring to engineering, not shitcoin scam crap.

          If I don’t keep up with stuff there, there’s no other places to follow the buzz.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    They’re still banning or driving away anyone outside of Musk’s echo chamber.

    The vast majority of users are not big time contributors to the site’s quality content. But the content creators had the biggest targets on their back for retaliation. After so many bans over such a long period, there’s just less and less people to post quality content for the majority to consume.

    Cracking down on narrative control doesn’t force the public to see things your way. It just drives them to other, more relevant platforms. Not sure how many times we need to go through this cycle for them to understand how futile this is.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    And in Mexico, Nicaragua, Honduras, Panama, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, and Buenos Aires, no es possible, nadie Vuela mas barato!

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    Any day now, Elon Musk’s X, formerly Twitter, will go down in flames. This will prove once and for all that Elon Musk is worthy of derision!

  • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    In X’s EU user base report consisting of data from February to July 2023, Musk’s social media platform had 112.2 million monthly active users in the EU. In the following six month period from August 2023 to January 2024, that number dropped to 111.4 million users.

    That’s a minuscule drop % wise

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          How would that make him a non-billionare?

          He paid $44B for Twitter, even if it completely failed and he could realize no value from any of the assets. $44B is a small portion of his wealth.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      X’s most recent report, covering February to July 2024, showed that its user base in the EU fell once more to 105.9 million.

      And these are datapoints they release themselves, 3rd party data points hint at bigger losses.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      You are a MAU if you use the platform once a month by opening the app by mistake, and also if you doom scroll for 10 hours a day.

      You continue to be one if you go from one to the other. Musk has been cherry picking stats before, so what they release will be the nicest numbers they can find.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        It’s even worse in social media, because most users that sign up stop using it at some point.

        So the product can die pretty quick if they don’t generate new users, especially when they alienate old ones.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Indeed. Active users (say, used within the past month) is a much better metric.

          I often wonder about this for many (especially older) YouTube channels - your channel is 15 years old, how many of your 500k subscribers actually still watch or even have active accounts?

          I wonder what subscriber growth rate a typical YouTube channel needs just in order to maintain a consistent level of watchers?

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        You’re assuming he gives a shit about how much profit it’s making.

        It’s not a public company, it’s now his private playground to try to get millions of people to see only the “free speech” he wants them to see, and exert political influence.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          He’d love to also milk it financially, but that’s actually really hard to do with Twitter.

          You could say though as a capitalist he also gets a return on investment by manipulating public opinion in favour of conservatism.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            I don’t think he even cares that much about money, except that it’s useful/needed for the things he wants to accomplish.

            Unfortunately, the things he wants have gotten steadily shittier and shittier and more disgusting over the last 15 years.

            • zqps@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              You don’t get to become a billionaire, let alone the wealthiest person on earth, without being a greedy fuck. Remember he never actually wanted to buy Twitter, only tried hard to spin the narrative after being sued into it.

  • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Anyone else that cannot read this article? When I try to scroll it just don’t move…