Summary

Following Donald Trump’s recent election victory, Google searches for “4B,” a South Korean feminist movement advocating a “no sex, no dating, no marriage, no children” stance, surged in the U.S.

The 4B movement, popular among young women on social media, promotes individual resistance against conservative politics and the erosion of reproductive rights.

The trend reflects a broader ideological divide between young men and women in the U.S., where women under 30 are significantly more liberal than men.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t think anyone involved thinks she’s talking about every single young man. Well, except you, of course

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      Now he’s just worried that they’re talking about him. Which they probably are considering his immediate defensive reaction.

      • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Jesus Fucking Christ, do we literally have to have women say things like:

        “Young men – not all, just some, well in some areas most, but a lot of young men – expect…”

        This tiptoeing bullshit to not anger some fragile men is insane. I lived as a straight man for over 40 years and this new idea that men are somehow put upon whenever a woman brings up being objectified, or has an issues with interactions with /takes a breath some, but not all, just a large amount, enough to be traumatizing, particularly as it’s systemic to the patriarchy, men.

        This is ridiculous semantic bullshit in response to women feeling like objects and pushing back.

        We’re better than this, and I’m tired of watching us act absolutely horrible whenever women point out systemic, extremely frequent issues they have with men, and have to inch around it so as to not break our fragile egos.

        • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I agree. It’s like the whole “Not all men” deal: nitpicking the details of the phrasing instead of tackling the root issue. You’re only fighting those symptoms that affect you directly, not the root cause.

          The day I have someone yelling in my face that I’m to blame for some other man’s rape is the day I’ll argue about that issue. Until then, let’s focus on the actual problem: In this case (some) young men being pieces of garbage.

          • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            Just the ones who conform to my incredibly contemptuous description of them (a majority of white women apparently).

            Going to need an attribution there, champ.

            • JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              5 days ago

              What kind of attribution do I need? I’m only talking about the ones who fit the description. Seems to me like trump voters fit that description but hey, if I’m wrong no biggy. After all I am only talking about the ones that do. Can’t you just infer that?