• assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Republicans would vote for the corpse of Trump before even considering not making a terrible decision. I cannot believe that this election is this close. It’s mind boggling that the outcome is currently a toss up between Nazi spray tan confused grandpa and middle road politician.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If he died tomorrow Republicans would be Black-Friday-75%-off-smart-tvs trampling each other to be the one to skin him and wear him so they could continue the coup.

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The point isn’t to get Trump into the Whitehouse; it’s to get Vance into the whitehouse.

      Trump will legitimately kick the bucket within the next four years, guaranteed. And Vance will be the one to take his place. Vance will be the one who is suddenly an “incumbant” backed by the heritage foundation who is actually reasonably well spoken, able to debate, far smarter than Trump, and younger.

      Vance wasn’t “chosen” by Trump, he came as a part of the deal with the Heritage Foundation to get him elected.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        My hope is that after Herr Trump finally croaks there will be a power vacuum in the party. Sure if he’s elected and it happens in office there will be an effort to consolidate around Vance, but you know some looked over pissant is waiting in the wings to try to take the reins. If he’s not elected it will likely be much more tumultuous. Here’s hoping.

        • flying_mechanic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Trump is a figurehead and mouth piece only, it’s clear the backing and power behind him is pushing him, not the other way around. If Trump is dead or unelectable then they will sub in someone else. Trump’s “saving grace” is that he was good at speaking in a relatable but obfuscating way which worked to foment the masses against imagined grievances, but that’s not a trait unique to him. He is unfortunately replaceable with not much loss in momentum.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Trump will legitimately kick the bucket within the next four years, guaranteed.

        Putin is furiously trying to figure out how to put polonium into a Big Mac

    • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s infuriating that the election is this close. People were complaining that Biden was too old. A smart qualified candidate took his place, Trump now is having mental breakdowns in public, and somehow, the election is still a toss-up.

      • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Bruh I know the Overton window in the US is megafucked but she’s literally one of our most liberal politicians by voting record, she is not “firmly right wing” by any reasonable standard

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          68
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          She’s in favor of a fascist border policy against asylum seekers, a firm supporter of the fascist Zionist entity known as Israel, and wants to appoint members of the fascist party to her cabinet if she wins. She’s been endorsed by architects of the Iraq war and the US torture program.

          California’s top cop is right-wing.

          • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Don’t mistake me for a Kamala Harris apologist- she is absolutely a huge centrist in her presidential campaign. I am tired of this false equivalency with the total fascist ilk she’s running against. It’s not useful and it’s dishonest.

            • GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              11 hours ago

              She is not a centrist, Bill Clinton was a centrist. With what she’s proposing, her actions, and the endorsements she’s fought for, she’s on par with Trump. She may not say the quiet parts out loud like trump, but her actions speak louder than the words she’s not saying.

              • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I hate to be pedantic but that’s almost exactly the definition of a centrist, someone who collaborates with both sides (even if one of those sides is fascist, genocidal, racist, etc.). And again, I don’t disagree, it’s a bad thing to be for exactly that reason. But it’s also a different thing than being explicitly a right wing authoritarian fascist like Trump is.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  A centrist collaborates with the right and left (mostly the right), but fascists are to the right of the right. They’re far right, which is a distinct grouping from ordinary right-wing ideology. Fascist collaboration requires becoming right-wing, just to meet them halfway.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            She’s been endorsed by architects of the Iraq war and the US torture program.

            Because your daddy is worse in their eyes.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              11 hours ago

              If you find yourself agreeing with Dick Cheney on politics you might want to rethink your positions.

              He doesn’t like Trump because he’s a destabilizing element. He agitates the masses against him and does stupid shit for no reason that makes allies and adversarie alike stop trusting the US. He’s bad for business.

              Harris will be good for the empire. That’s it.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                What if you find yourself agreeing with Repubs that you should vote for third parties over a Dem? Or is that different because saying so doesn’t support the pro-MAGA campaigning you are here for?

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                If Dick Cheney told you he thought wearing a seatbelt was a good idea, you’d argue against him because clearly an idea is bad if a bad person has it.

                Evaluate an argument on its merits, regardless of who endorses it.

                • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  While true, that commenter is a very well known bad actor and provocateur. I recommend against engaging.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  Obviously he’s not, like, a chaos demon. He presumably eats human food and all that.

                  But he’s a monster and should be in prison, not giving endorsements. This is like being endorsed by Anders Brevik or some shit.

                  She should have rejected the endorsement. Instead she’s embracing him. It’s disgusting.

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If by right wing you mean not strictly anti-capitalist, sure, at the end of the day shes not going to ovsrthrow capitalism. Still the policies and protections she wants to enact is the furthest left we’ve gone in multiple lifetimes. The last time we’ve had any kind of policy proposal like hers was likely FDR.

        • GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          11 hours ago

          FDR proposals, which directly came from a socialist, actually helped the working class. Our wages suck, our labor conditions sucks, our future prospects sucks, and we keep getting told everything is fine. She and democrats are not progressive in action, only in lip service.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Do those accounts include the one where she just called for legalizing pot?

        Or is that a Right position in your mind?