• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Code share so you can replicate the analysis yourself, https://codeshare.io/zl96xj. This is what I form my opinion: real actual data pulled as of about 30s ago when I ran the script.

    Arizona. Increasing poll numbers up to the 10th of Sept. Declining polling since.

    Florida, same story:

    GA, same story:

    MI, same story:

    NV, same story:

    Reality. Harris’s poll numbers were going up for a while. They aren’t any more. They are declining.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Love how the Dems haven’t learned a single fucking thing from Hillary, and are already attacking statistical analysis showing that once again this will be an election won by the tiniest of margins.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I love how leftists produce their own data to support bullshit that they then feed one another on the daily here.

        This “statistical analysis” is home-grown bullshit that’s been dismissed time and again. But you do you bud. In a month, we won’t have to hear from ant if you again. Because if Harris wins, you will all pile on the celebrations and pretend you had nothing to do with it, like you did in 2020-

        and if she loses, you’ll disappear into a cloud of vapor and resurface as victims of your own ignorance, lie you did in 2016.

    • Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Aaaaand… where are you pulling this from exactly? OHHHH! Right it’s your own data. Amazing how it supports your argument.

      You’ll have to excuse me while I laugh a bit before I summarily dismiss your nonsense.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        These are from Nate Slivers data stores that I have access to. These are not his models, these are the raw poll results.

        You’ll have to excuse me while I laugh a bit before I summarily dismiss your nonsense.

        Thats because you don’t live in reality.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Riiiiight. If you say so. It stil doesn’t change the fact that you’re using your own scripts to support points that disagree with pretty much everyone else.

          Look man. I’ve been around a while. I see things. You’ve been called out over this by many- MANY people with FAR more patience than I have, so if you want to know my take on it-

          Just reference EVERONE that has ever disagreed with your rhetoric. Maybe… I don’t know-

          Write a script for it.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Riiiiight. If you say so. It stil doesn’t change the fact that you’re using your own scripts to support points that disagree with pretty much everyone else.

            Bruh, its a simple fucking analysis that any one with two braincells to squeak together can understand. What was the trend for the last 30 days? What was the trend before that? How are things going?

            But reality doesn’t agree with your bias, so reality must be wrong.

            • Soup@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              “bRuH…”

              No, it doesn’t agree with reliable polling. And even if we were to dismiss critical thinking and blindly assume that your biased results were accurate-

              Polls don’t mean shit on Election Day.

              So stop with the obvious attempts to disrupt an election and just let us get on with it,

              mmmmkay?

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                Sure. Now that reality doesn’t agree with your delusional vision of the world “it doesn’t matter”

                So stop with the obvious attempts to disrupt an election and just let us get on with it, mmmmkay?

                Or maybe, your attempt to deny reality is genuinely hurting the Democrats chances. Its fucking identical, what you are doing, to what happened in 2016. Its exactly what was happening before Biden dropped out.

                You, quite literally, are the problem, and are significantly damaging Democrats chances this November.

                • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I’m voting and hurting nothing but calling out bias. Walk away. Your bullshit polls are what’s hurting. But that’s the point… right?