According to the Australian Federal Police, a then-32-year-old man from Western Australia was disruptive on a flight headed from Perth to Sydney. As a result, the plane had to turn around and go back to Perth, which meant that the pilot was forced to dump some fuel to land.

Now, the passenger has been ordered to pay $8,630 AUD ($5,806 USD) back to the airline to cover the cost of the wasted fuel. The Perth Magistrate Court also fined him $6,055, meaning that his mid-air misbehavior has a total price tag of $11,861 – likely many times higher than whatever h

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s exactly right. But much evaporates or is diffused over such a large area that no one particular piece of land gets a significant amount.

    The alternative is landing overweight, risking potential damage or failure to the aircraft’s landing gear, full of human lives, while still full of the explodey stuff.

    The other alternative is designing planes to land at heavier weights, resulting in every other flight being less efficient.

    • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thanks… Yeah that makes sense. I can understand that sometimes the trade-off would make dumping fuel the right choice… I just wonder if the environmental impact factor in.