Now, the words and figures “with the exception of articles 2-c, 4-c, 5-c, 12-c, 13-c, 14-c, 17-c, 21-c and 22-c” have been removed from the Regulation, i.e. everyone will be recognised as fit under the “controversial” articles:

  • 2-c – clinically treated tuberculosis;
  • 4-c – viral hepatitis with minor functional impairment;
  • 5-c – asymptomatic HIV carrier;
  • 12-c - slowly progressive and non-progressive with minor functional impairment and rare exacerbations of anaemia, blood clotting disorders, purpura, haemorrhagic conditions, other diseases of the blood and haematopoietic organs, and some disorders involving the immune mechanism;
  • 13-c - diseases of the endocrine system with minor functional disorders;
  • 14-c - mild, short-term, painful manifestations of mental disorders;
  • 17-c - neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders with moderate or short-term manifestations, with an asthenic state;
  • 21-c – slowly progressive diseases of the central nervous system with minor functional disorders;
  • 22-c – episodic and paroxysmal disorders, except for epilepsy, with minor impairment of organ and system functions.
  • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    1119·
    1 year ago

    My thoughts exactly. You put me on the front line and my general commander is getting a bullet. Not saying I’ll remember doing it but nobody dies except those that force me to kill.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      166·
      1 year ago

      Saying you don’t “remember” doing it is probably not going to help much in your court-martial when you’ve posted a pre-meditated plan to do it on an open social media platform beforehand.

          • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            712·
            1 year ago

            I would rather die than kill. If you tell me to kill I will kill you first to limit the amount of total death.

            This is the ultimate utilitarian take on the ethics of the situation you dunce.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              156·
              1 year ago

              You say you’d rather die than kill, and then in the very next line you threaten to kill me for telling you something.

              You need to read up on what being a “conscientious objector” is actually about, or whatever it is you’re going for here, because your philosophy is incoherent.

              • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                910·
                1 year ago

                Believe it or not, this would completely cripple military power across the board. Overall, resulting in less death than the death of the white collar pencil pushers that command troops.

                Sure you can be the bootlicker that shoots people for funsies, don’t come crying to me when you get drafted

                Edit: where tf did I threaten you specifically?..

                • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                  76·
                  1 year ago

                  You said:

                  If you tell me to kill I will kill you first

                  Even if you just mean it as a “generic” you, you’re still making it quite clear that you’re more willing to kill than you are to die.

                  You realize there are other options than “follow orders to kill someone” and “kill the guy who gave you an order”, right?

                  don’t come crying to me when you get drafted

                  I’m Canadian.

                  • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    64·
                    1 year ago

                    Definitely generic “you.” But if you plan on leading troops we can make it happen?

                    Edit: Honestly cute you think Canada wouldn’t follow USA into the next great drafted war