Now, the words and figures “with the exception of articles 2-c, 4-c, 5-c, 12-c, 13-c, 14-c, 17-c, 21-c and 22-c” have been removed from the Regulation, i.e. everyone will be recognised as fit under the “controversial” articles:

  • 2-c – clinically treated tuberculosis;
  • 4-c – viral hepatitis with minor functional impairment;
  • 5-c – asymptomatic HIV carrier;
  • 12-c - slowly progressive and non-progressive with minor functional impairment and rare exacerbations of anaemia, blood clotting disorders, purpura, haemorrhagic conditions, other diseases of the blood and haematopoietic organs, and some disorders involving the immune mechanism;
  • 13-c - diseases of the endocrine system with minor functional disorders;
  • 14-c - mild, short-term, painful manifestations of mental disorders;
  • 17-c - neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders with moderate or short-term manifestations, with an asthenic state;
  • 21-c – slowly progressive diseases of the central nervous system with minor functional disorders;
  • 22-c – episodic and paroxysmal disorders, except for epilepsy, with minor impairment of organ and system functions.
      • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would rather die than kill. If you tell me to kill I will kill you first to limit the amount of total death.

        This is the ultimate utilitarian take on the ethics of the situation you dunce.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say you’d rather die than kill, and then in the very next line you threaten to kill me for telling you something.

          You need to read up on what being a “conscientious objector” is actually about, or whatever it is you’re going for here, because your philosophy is incoherent.

          • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Believe it or not, this would completely cripple military power across the board. Overall, resulting in less death than the death of the white collar pencil pushers that command troops.

            Sure you can be the bootlicker that shoots people for funsies, don’t come crying to me when you get drafted

            Edit: where tf did I threaten you specifically?..

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              You said:

              If you tell me to kill I will kill you first

              Even if you just mean it as a “generic” you, you’re still making it quite clear that you’re more willing to kill than you are to die.

              You realize there are other options than “follow orders to kill someone” and “kill the guy who gave you an order”, right?

              don’t come crying to me when you get drafted

              I’m Canadian.

              • Fascist Lib Instance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Definitely generic “you.” But if you plan on leading troops we can make it happen?

                Edit: Honestly cute you think Canada wouldn’t follow USA into the next great drafted war