The news mod team has asked to no longer be a part of the project until we have a composite tool that polls multiple sources for a more balanced view.

It will take a few hours, but FOR NOW there won’t be a bot giving reviews of the source.

The goal was simple: make it easier to show biased sources. This was to give you and the mods a better view of what we were looking at.

The mod team is in agreement: one source of truth isn’t enough. We are working on a tool to give a composite score, from multiple sources, all open source.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nope, that’s not how it works.

      There are instances that only allow up votes. There are people that will up vote any post by a dev as a show of appreciation for the effort, without necessarily thinking about or agreeing with the changes.

      If you want a poll, then you have to do a proper poll. Up- and down votes are not it.

      • Five@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I want the bot gone but didn’t downvote the post. I support the mods reaching out for feedback, and also downvoting could decrease the visibility of the bot’s overwhelming negative reception.

    • stormesp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you joking or something? Have you read any of the comments on that thread or this one? I really cant get how denial the mod team on some .world lemmy communities can be.

      • JonsJava@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I read every comment. As I’m a mod here, I will only be civil, so I am keeping all my thoughts to myself. Have a good day.

        • stormesp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          And you have the balls to cite the upvotes on that thread as an argument when you know for a fact most feedback is against the concept of the bot itself? People upvoted that thread because the title made it seem the mod team was willing to do something.

          • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            …which we just did.

            Edit: Downvoted for removing the bot like people asked. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.