• dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If Trump gets the Presidency, you still can affect national level politics by voting in your Representative and Senator.

    If Democrats hold Senate and House, they can protect us more from Trump. Every state matters, because every state has 2 Senators at a minimum (and Senators are very, very powerful). Senators are state-wide and therefore immune to any gerrymandering (only House Members have the Gerrymandering problem)

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s also a slew of other local elections that can be equally, if not more important than national congressional races. A great deal of the GOP’s ability to put a stranglehold on progress has been from their fairly dedicated takeover of statehouses and local elections. We need to have an even greater level of determination when it comes to showing up to vote. Every. Single. Election.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There are 100 senators.
      66 are not on the ballot in 2024.
      Of the 34 remaining, 23 are safe and 2 are likely.
      That leaves 9 seats. 7 are leaning one way or the other.
      2 are toss ups, Ohio and Montana. Vote if live there. Probably even the leaning 7. But the rest…?

      As an aside, if all the leans break the way they are leaning, Dems have to hold the two toss ups to have a 50-50 Senate.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        I plan to vote in Montana. I’ll do you that favor if you do me the favor of not talking this way. Every vote matters in every election in every state. The only reason what you’re saying is somewhat true is because people believe it’s true. Don’t perpetuate that idea.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t think so. There’s never only unopposed candidates on a ballot.

            That said, even if you were correct, who does it help to point that out?

            • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Many down ballot positions are unopposed where I live. Of course, I think you only are talking about national seats.

              The utility, then, is to note that safe seats operate similarly to unopposed seats especially when it comes to funding by national parties.