It’s that capitalist policy of murders and acquisitions.

It’s visual pollution anywhere. I cannot for the life of me fathom why anyone finds that style appealing to begin with.

Small government has only ever meant minimal regulation. It means nothing when it comes to civil rights or liberties.

Eh, then you just get those idiots who avoid using TODO: because it makes the code review “harder”.

// This is a broken example.
// Note: remove X before doing Y

No.

There’s not much actual evidence for a lot of people of the period (e.g., Pontius Pilate) outside of historical writings. That’s pretty ludicrous way to rationalize a petty belief.

There’s no qualification to be a developer to access github though, I think is what the person you responded to is saying. It’s entirely possible for a user to end up at github without a true understanding of its purpose. Therefore, it would be helpful if it was more clear to the average non-developer user that what they’re looking at is a code repository and is not meant for general consumption.

You forgot the switch.

Cancer is prone to relapse.

The best surprises come from unexpected places.

Welcome to missing the point, population: you.

“The left is just as bad.”

Must be awesome having your head buried so deep in the sand that you can drink straight from the water table.

100%

Nah she just likes to take work home with her. Doesn’t have to be her work, clearly.

I will pour my heart, soul and life savings into an AOC for president campaign as soon as she decides she’s ready.

This person pays attention folks.

No

Most people commenting here didn’t hear the questions beyond what clips they heard via the media. The ignorance is astounding. And in a hard core anti-trump voter.

No. The questions posed by the Supreme Court centered around whether there was merit in allowing any single state, which may have arbitrary criteria and or processes, to effectively eliminate a candidate from the ballot, and if so, under what constraints. Ours a valid question. Where is the line? If you allow this precedent, how might it be abused by others?