That’s generous. Statistically speaking, fewer can read than will.

Their book says…

I gotta say: I love this. It’s super late, but I’ll come back with a story or two. 🕸️🐈‍⬛🦇🖤💀🌚🎃👻

What a lukewarm compliment. I need to wash my hands now, ew.

Too bad your next promotion’ll be the front lines, troll. Good luck.

Don’t disparage pedophiles by association. They’re altogether vile and unfathomably sick in the head, but this fuck-smear? Far worse

Thank the gods for the article, then. That simple phrase alone can’t possibly carry the deep complexity of that convoluted concept. Whew.

Way to keep with the redundant theme. 🙂

You wanna not perpetuate the clickbait BS, and just give us the “detail”, FFS? 🤦🏼‍♂️

edit: It’s a completely shit “article” of a mere four sections of limp, repetitive “quotes” drowned in ads, etc. that finally give up the ghost:

"…the folks that we’re focused on, those lower propensity voters that don’t always vote, they are tuning in and showing up at a higher level in support of the vice president.”

Heh.

NT “journalist” : Breaking news: CPTSD & ADHD are closer relatives than previously thought.

NDs : …

This is the way. Furthermore, this is also the first step in making homemade moon units: infused marshmallows — and there is no other s’mores after that. You’ve been warned. Have fun!

The Burbs.

Start with the 1%, and gauge response. Repeat with the 2% and add guillotines as set pieces, guage response. Lather, rinse, repeat until shit gets better. 🤘🏼

That’s edging toward muddying the point. You could also bring heritage (aka “race”) into the argument, or age, or disability, et al, and risk doing the same. No one’s debating granular data per geophysical location, etc., as this is a median national income bifurcation topic.

They might also use that term because they confuse it with “rich”, and that’s a whole other issue: intentionally sub-par (mis)education to maintain the socioeconomic divide.

Speaking in broad volumetric terms and then switching to simply stating (see: spoiler) the per annum floor for said 1% is sloppy and misleading. Please include the range that the 1% encompasses, earnings wise, to keep your modeling consistent.

Yeah, most of the entire country is a single missed paycheck/health emergency/household crisis away from absolute destitution.

The level of cognitive dissonance in those very same people demonizing & dehumanizing houselessness-related issues is forebodingly despicable — considering they’re >this< close to being “one of them”. 😶🤦🏼‍♂️😥

Wake the fuck up, fellow citizens. You’re chattel to the rich. Pawns. Playthings.

But, we outnumber them by the billions. We. Are legion.

Why stop at 1%, though?