It’s war. You can call it that. It doesn’t change any of the points in the comment that you’re replying to. Of course they won’t change your mind either because, youre just a racist troll.
It’s war. You can call it that. It doesn’t change any of the points in the comment that you’re replying to. Of course they won’t change your mind either because, youre just a racist troll.
Holy shit. We’re back to this? Do you also think that the ghost of Kiev will lead the Ukranazis to victory?
There have been calls for the opposition to provide their “evidence” of electoral fraud, but they won’t, because it doesn’t exist. Of course, the western media skips over this entirely and immediately places the burden of evidence on Maduro’s party. Guilty until proven innocent is an important Amerikkkan value, after all.
Lol, LMao even
Most of the world agrees that:
So what’s the problem here?
This admunintelligible accomplgurgling I was the first black female president unintelligible jack!
These libs are so used to having stopped caring about a war 8 years before it’s lost that they don’t even recognize what losing a war looks like. They think they can copium their way into Ukraine getting better terms.
Lmao. You’re going to need to provide a source for that one.
Final guess: 11ty?
The problem with liberal democracies isn’t that representatives are elected, its who those politicians represent. It’s not the working class, except when it is and those politicians get Salvador Allende’d 💀.
Can anyone guess what it is? My guess is SolidJS
But I suppose the question is whether there is that much demand for EVs?
Remove the tariffs / open up the market and you’ll find out. I suspect that there wouldn’t be a need for these tariffs if the demand wasn’t there.
Great explanation. Thank you!
I do not. You say that the CIA does however, so the analogy still works.
And that’s different from Amerikkka how?
Pot calling the kettle black. 🤷
I am neither a mister nor a Bolshevik.
I’ll take the L on this one. I shouldn’t have assumed your gender. I’m sorry.
The Bolshevik thing was sarcasm.
So the CIA calls him a dictator in one memo and not in another. I suppose that proves nothing in the end. Except that the CIA clearly doesn’t understand Soviet governance based on the other details in the memo that you linked.
Lol