I live in the middle of nowhere and it’s been a lifesaver. The competition is good, because now satellite providers will need to up their game. It also keeps ISPs from locking down an area with insane prices and no alternatives rich is overall a great thing.
Most people enjoy having feces thrown at them from what I’ve gathered.
Monkey see monkey do
It kinda sounds like this guy but that’s totally fine, I actually enjoy it
Funky finds funky. Sometimes you just gotta be yourself and someone will ooze out of the woodwork.
Man… are you good? You sound like a guy who showed up at my house and started saying that the pyramids and stars would aline and tell us the meaning of the universe. Also that açaí berries were the ultimate nutrition. Hope you’re doing okay there.
There are two podcast episodes about this guy, his siblings, and their mother called Breaking The Oath. Very good and they interview all of them too.
Yeah, Hyperx pulsefire. Got mine for $20 and it’s been great. I did have a g602 but wanted a lighter and wired mouse, and decided to go cheap instead of more expensive like I normally would.
It comes with Arch!
WhAt A mOcKiNgBiRd LoOkS lIkE iN eXcRuCiAtInG dEtAiL
This is a good meme
My wallet is unhappy but my brain craves portable space engineers
You are not being helpful lol
I want one but I don’t need one
Well, if that’s how you win an argument, I don’t read IGN.
But for those who are curious, in the first posted video he talks about a timeline walkthrough that the editor did. All the jets are CGI covers over F-14s painted grey with lighting markers, except the F-18s. HOWEVER, there were only ever 1 or 2 F-18s in the air, so when you see a squadron of them, the others are CGI.
So yes, there were some real jets, but that wasn’t the argument you made. You said the film was done practically, which is not true. Even if you have 2/4 jets really in the air, that’s not “practical” and still counts as CGI.
And I can see where you got this opinion, the news outlets at the time and all interviews spouted “NO CGI!!” Because it is good marketing, but it’s not true.
The planes look good, but they are almost entirely CGI. The difference is that they used realistic flight maneuvers and reference lighting to make it look really good. Practical effects means little to no CGI and that definitely does not apply here.
Would that not just be… jeans?
Ramen
You know, sometimes I forget there are in fact forces in space. For some reason I was thinking about it like a small explosion of dust in atmosphere, but obviously all sorts of things can affect a massive nebula that spans light years. I think it was the fact that they look so blobby and constrained even when they aren’t really
I should know this given I’m a huge space nerd, I think I desperately need more sleep lol
I have a question and wondering if anyone can answer: why are nebulas not round or more spherical? If there isn’t anything to push the gasses around, why done they expand into a rough sphere shape?
Large online communities like this gathering is one of my favorite things about the Internet
Hell yeah, a Lemmy poet!