That’s not how brackets work?

Probably just the title directly from the link

But generic type syntax is a feature exclusive to Typescript while typeof is a JavaScript thing. You’d never get Pie[Pie[T]] as a result from a typeof check. (Please excuse the square brackets; seems like the markdown parser here isn’t quite right and it keeps messing up the angle brackets)

Also, it’s typeof foo not typeof(foo) in js

factoid actualy just statistical error. average palestinian eats 0 pieces of bread per day. Breads Georg, who lives in cave & eats over 190,000 each hour, is an outlier adn should not have been counted

What is this from?

Not descriptive enough

Libre

There are some cases where any must be used instead of unknown but they usually involve generic constraints and seem more like a bug than intended behavior

There’s a difference between emulation and what Analogue does. Analogue’s products actually implement the hardware of their respective consoles in FPGAs. (Also, what Kecessa said)

That’s a narrow genre

Is “gorror” a term? It should be

Fwiw Linux is way easier today than it was a million years ago. Honestly I find it simpler to use than Windows.

No no, 10 base 512 lines of code

Someone’s trying to smash a stack

We already have bacteria that eat plastic

You can, pretty easily. Enable developer mode and use adb. Doesn’t need root. (At least I didn’t for YouTube; not sure about the rest)

It makes sense if you just think of everything as a function.

JSX can exist without React; it’s essentially just an alternative syntax for function calls.

(That is, annoyingly, handicapped in the Typescript checker)

Chrome will show :D when you have over a hundred tabs. Firefox shows ∞

I know this from extensive experience

JABBERLOOP

Not really relaxing but good