I’ve had the opposite experience. The older the pasta, the longer it takes to cook. If it cooks faster, that suggests to me that it has absorbed water during storage, which allows harmful bacteria to grow and the pasta might actually be expired.
Their privacy policy: https://www.fossify.org/policy/clock/
Same. That’s when everyone else goes to sleep and actually leaves you time to focus on your work.
GT Sophy on Gran Turismo
I bake quite a bit and I don’t do my mise-en-place either when it comes to baking, but that’s not a problem. The way recipes are formatted works well for my process as well. I read through the steps ahead of time if it’s a recipe I am unfamiliar with, then I’ll just have the ingredients list open while I’m doing the prep. The things I make are pretty basic (cookies, cakes, muffin, etc) and the steps are all identical. Mix wet, mix dry, mix everything, bake.
I personally find that having less repeated information makes things easier and faster to read. The recipe says “add flour”, you know that it’s all the flour. If the recipe says “add flour (1 cup)”, then I have to check back in the ingredients list to figure out if that’s all the flour or only part of it. Then the more info you add to clarify, the harder it is to skim while you’re cooking.
To the best of my knowledge, this information only exists in the prompt. The raw LLM has no idea what it is and the APIs serve the raw LLM.
Normally, portioning out the ingredients would be the first step of the process and is all done at once.
I’ve always interpreted it as being equivalent to “what’s done is done”
Valid opinion on the phrasing. Disagree with the premise that anything someone says is necessarily their opinion.
Example: “For me, potatoes are easier to peel with a knife than a potato peeler” vs “Potatoes are easier to peel with a knife than a potato peeler”. The former says that this is my experience and yours may differ. The latter says that this is true in general and if you find it easier the other way, there’s a good chance you’re doing something wrong.
And she’s only getting half of the controls with no coordination between the two. She doesn’t know how strong of a stream you’re giving her and you can’t adjust it based on where she plans to point your dick.
Is this the internet equivalent of laugh tracks to inform us that your comment is funny?
Could you process it further and package it up to sell as salt? Or is this not the same thing as table salt?
I’ve never found Bing chat to match up with the free ChatGPT. It often just refuses to answer my question while ChatGPT will at least take a guess and give me something to work with.
I’ve noticed that it sometimes smells like epoxy glue. I wonder if we’re thinking of the same scent.
Quickly filtering out a subset of them to prioritize so that we get the most value possible out of the time that humans spend on it.
LLMs cannot:
LLMs can
Semantics aside, they’re very different skills that require different setups to accomplish. Just because counting is an easier task than analysing text for humans, doesn’t mean it’s the same it’s the same for a LLM. You can’t use that as evidence for its inability to do the “harder” tasks.
Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.
It certainly would be. Thankfully, there’s many more than zero human eyes involved in this.
Considering that it’s a language task, LLMs exist, and the cost, it’s a reasonable assumption. It’d be pretty silly to analyse a bag of words when you have tools you can use with minimal work with much better results. Even sillier to spend over $200 for something that can be run on a decade old machine in a few hours.
Yeah, this sounds like something I’d find at a diner.
What do you typically use your mayo for? I’m curious because all the stuff you add to your mayo is stuff that I would normally have in whatever dish is using the mayo, so I’m wondering if it actually makes a difference to have it blended in the sauce versus separate.