• 0 Posts
  • 134 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle





  • Sorry that’s my mistake - I should have said “source available”, rather than “open source”. IMO, being source available is the critical component of a password manager like Bitwarden, and is what I meant when I referred to their main competitive advantage.

    They might also choose to be open source and fix this specific issue and return to GPL-compatibility, but remaining source available would seem to be the more critical factor.






  • Gitlab has demonstrated its commitment to keep the core of their product, though limited in features, free and open source. As of now, BW’s clients cannot even be compiled without the proprietary SDK anymore.

    None of that makes Bitwarden not open source. Not only that, they specifically state this is a bug which will be addressed.

    I would go as far as to say that Bitwarden’s main competitive advantage and differentiation is that it’s open source. They would be insane to stop that.






  • edit: I think I’ve misunderstood the point of the article. He is saying passkeys are dangerous for people without password managers, therefore for most people passwords are still better (since most people don’t use password managers). It’s not so much a problem with passkeys, but the lack of password managers.


    Even in the best case scenario, where you’re using an iPhone and a Mac that are synced with Keychain Access via iCloud

    Surely the better-case scenario would be using a password manager?

    The article doesn’t address the recommended use-case of passkeys + password manager, which makes it kind of irrelevant.