if you think they’re misusing the term, just get to your point and explain why. asking people tedious questions multiple comments in a row just comes off as sea-lioning.
if you think they’re misusing the term, just get to your point and explain why. asking people tedious questions multiple comments in a row just comes off as sea-lioning.
seems a bit unnecessary, is there not enough time to do that at school? not like you need to dedicate class time to lectures on coloring.
might as well release it and see what happens.
“Simply, this case presents serious, difficult and new legal issues.”
No, the ban last year is the case that presented “serious, difficult and new legal issues”. This ruling is just restoring things to the way they were for decades.
i don’t think it’s “for” anyone in particular. this is just who he is.
where do you live? homework at age 4?
exactly, it would be a catastrophe. so many industries would grind to a halt without their trained laborers, and even if you did somehow manage to backfill all those with documented workers (yeah right), the cost to do so would be insane for less skilled, less efficient workers. the inflation would make post-covid look insignificant by comparison.
I don’t think this has anything to do with covid. Trump’s entire 2016 campaign was about building a border wall, and Fox cranks up the border talk leading up to every single election cycle.
not to mention, as if any Americans actually want to do the jobs that undocumented immigrants are doing for us.
Deporting illegal immigrants who commit violent crimes, for example, would fall under that.
The actual phrasing in the poll was, “The mass deportation of undocumented immigrants”. I kind of doubt most people would think targeted deportation like for criminals would count as “mass deportation of undocumented immigrants”.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
but very close to not being protected, hence the warning.
it’s easier to win elections with shitty candidates if you’re not worried about the opponent winning.
sure, but this guy is not even being charged with anything. we are talking about a warning.
“The FBI visited my house today for free speech acts they knew were not crimes.”
Uh, calling for violence is NOT protected under the first amendment, so you can fuck right off with that.
“It is well understood that the right of free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances. There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or ‘fighting’ words – those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.”
that’s not accurate. Title 42 was ended at the same time they ended the covid-19 emergency in May 2023.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/title-42-ending-whats-next-explainer-cec/index.html