• 0 Posts
  • 269 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2023

help-circle





  • The “voting public” deciding a candidate is above the law isn’t democratic.

    The courts are not a democratic institution, they’re there to apply the laws passed by a democratically elected government in a fair and impartial manner.

    Sure the laws should be subject to the will of the people, but the application of the law should not. That’s nonsense.

    Saying it’s dangerous to apply a law everyone agrees with to a politician who committed crimes is absurd.

    Thanks for the response, now I KNOW you’re just a Trumptard playing “Devils advocate”.


  • This is in comparison to private corporations who have a profit incentive to monetize your data in every disgusting abusive way possible. Companies with a fiduciary duty to exploit every possible potential for profit or they can be sued by shareholders? Companies that aren’t publicly auditable so you’ll never know who they’re sharing your data with? Like the recent trend of cars selling your location data to your insurance company who then uses it to hike your rates?

    You’re comparing a government who has to be bribed or break a law in order to share your data at all with corporations who have a duty to sell it to the highest bidder. And in this comparison your conclusion is it’s the government that you can’t trust?

    Sorry, I have to say I’m completely baffled by your statements right now.



  • The half the country that disagrees isn’t disagreeing with the laws Trump broke and voting to repeal them. If they were, your argument would have standing. Trump wins, those laws get repealed, no one ever has to be subject to these unjust laws. In a scenario where someone was campaigning to legalize pot nationally but was in court for possession you would be 100% correct.

    However, this half the country wants those laws to continue to apply to everyone else, but not to apply to Trump, one of the most corrupt, self serving people ever to hold office. The whole country agrees that those laws should exist (fraud, sexual assault, corruption, election interference, insurrection). Half the country thinks Trump should just be above the law, and you can’t have democracy when the law treats people differently.

    Your argument sounds logical on the surface, but it’s deeply flawed to the point where it’s almost suspicious in its dishonestly.




  • Sounds like you’re the one misunderstanding goodwill. Goodwill doesn’t donate to ANY causes. Their ONLY contribution is employing disabled people and providing jobs/training. You can read it on their own website.

    Who does Goodwill help? Goodwill serves those with barriers to employment. This includes individuals with disabilities, people with limited work history, those who have experienced corporate downsizing and recipients of government support programs. Goodwill’s services are designed to meet the training and placement needs of the individual. https://www.goodwill.org/faqs/#d7

    There well known for paying their disabled employees below minimum wage while paying local store CEOs hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

    So don’t tell me about how the high prices I pay will support charities.


  • Hacksaw@lemmy.catoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldGoodwill is out of control
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    This is a store where people GIVE away their stuff, out of the goodness of their hearts with the premise that it will be sold at a low price so that someone less fortunate can benefit. If goodwill has decided to sell the merchandise it gets for FREE at “fair market value” to the highest bidder in order to maximise profit then what’s the point of goodwill? Might as well use a consignment store and get a cut.

    The exchange in “Goodwill” is that you’re donating in goodwill so your things can help others. That’s what goodwill MEANS.








  • Hacksaw@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldVery thankful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah. I had a dad that didn’t get laid too. Sex is in the bottom layers of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, then intimacy is up higher as well. If you’re not getting these things you’re not going to be able to hide them. Your kids won’t know why until they’re much older WHY your not happy, but that is a sadness of the soul that nothing can hide.

    You ever see one of your friends the day after they get laid and you just know. That’s a kind of joy from having your needs met that you can’t fake.

    You’re teaching your kids it’s OK with someone who doesn’t meet your needs. It’s not.

    Be with someone who makes you happy. Let your wife do the same. Show your kids what a happy marriage and happy parents look like so they can model their relationships that way. Don’t continue the cycle.