Bojimbo

What a useless metric. 12 year olds can be charged as adults in some states. He couldn’t vote, drink, smoke, be in porn, or buy a handgun. He was not an adult.

I stopped using shampoo and condition once a week. My scalp looks great and my hair is neither greasy nor dry.

Houthi Militia =/= Yemen

I doubt humane and effective are their goals. We know how to humanely kill. Assisted suicides do not use nitrogen gas or lethal injection. We can put any animal to sleep, but as soon as we are talking about criminals it seems like there is a required minimum of suffering to satisfy those who support the death penalty.

The math would mean they have labeled every post-pubescent boy as Hamas.

Not in US though

I’m not doubting you, but do you have any sources? I’d like to read more.

Why?

I’m not. I don’t think I’ve had that much fun with co-op in a game since portal 2.

deleted by creator

Hi, that’s me. I can handle endless heat, but fuck temps under 60.

deleted by creator

I’ve been registered to vote in blue and red states and the barriers to vote in red states are so much higher. Lines are longer, in less convenient locations, registration has to be done earlier, and sometime they might not count your vote or purge a voter directory and you have to check yourself to see if that the case so you can correct it. It’s more than people can’t be arsed to vote; it is intentionally made as inconvenient as possible.

I’m just a simple statistican, but I would be more worried about sun exposure, tap water quality, air quality, processed foods and occupational hazards (depending on job) over 3-4 drinks per year.

The better conclusion is “people who drink in moderation have a decreased risk of cancer”, which is different. Causation is hard to prove, especially when we can only ethically do observational studies. It’s likely that people who drink in moderation are more likely to make healthy choices in other areas of their life or have other factors that reduce risk.

I understand your conclusion, but in my experience not many people are advocating for reducing their 1st amendment rights. The majority of my experience with people claiming free speech is when it doesn’t apply. Like it does not protect anyone from being laughed at, ostracized, does not force people to buy goods or services from someone who says wild shit, and no one is required to give them a platform.

People only invoke the feelings of the founders when they either don’t have a stronger argument or are trying to appeal to conservatives. It’s basically religious interpretation at this point - mostly used to manipulate people who don’t know better.

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Most people simply arent going to go vegan, and many need to take baby steps toward it. Cutting out beef is a great first step.

I think weak labor protections for a people that commonly live paycheck to paycheck with health insurance from those jobs, poor social programs should they lose those jobs and a police force that has a robust history of violently shutting down protests might also have a hand

Indulgences are always bullshit.