• 6 Posts
  • 542 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s not about the size of the number, it’s about presenting information in a way that the average reader can understand. The best way to do that is to present it in the way that they’re accustomed to and I don’t think I’ve ever seen scientific notation used to refer to a sum of money.

    It’s great that you and I understand scientific notation, but it’s worthlesss when you’re trying to get the average person to understand what you’re writing if they don’t know it themselves.

    To make myself clear, I’m not saying that scientific notation isn’t useful, I’m just saying that most people don’t understand it.

    For extra credit, 74,500,000,000,000,000 aka seventy four quintillion, five hundred quadrillion.











  • The royal family costs the UK tax payer 77p per year, most people aren’t outraged by that.

    It can be argued that they attract a considerable amount of tourism, people that travel to the UK to see the Tower of London, the King’s guards, Buckingham palace and all the rest of it. There is also the “soft power”, people around the world are for some reason obsessed with the UK’s royal family and it does help with influence whether you’d argue that is for better or worse.

    I understand that the obscene wealth they hold during a cost of living crisis is an image problem to say the least and I don’t defend that. Such obscene wealth is awful no matter who you are and according to the times rich list, there are at least 257 residents in the UK that are more wealthy than the Royals, some of them considerably so.

    For the record, I’m not for or against the UK monarchy, I’m somewhere in-between and see validity in both sides of the argument.