Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it’s complicated.

  • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    > > > Ultimately though a lot of Nolan’s films are coded for a Conservative viewpoint > >

    Wat

    • Aculem@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure I would call Nolan an outright conservative, but there is a lot of state apologia and counter-revolutionary themes in The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises. There’s multiple examples including the justification of surveillance for anti-terrorism purposes, stateless anarchy portrayed as monstrous via Bane and The Joker, Alfred justifying imperialist actions in Burma, the protagonist being a rich billionaire, a lot of dialogue that seems to suggest it’s not the system that’s evil, but the lack of regulation against corruption, so on and so forth.

      You might say that a lot of what he seems to advocate for seems to be firmly liberal, but Liberalism is a conservative ideology if you’re looking outside America’s shortsighted left/right spectrum. I like Nolan’s work, but I constantly see suppression of revolutionary ideology in his work. I don’t think he hates progressivism, but I do think he’s riding the center, which in America, means right-wing.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blaming Nolan because Gil Kane and Bill Finger made the character a rich playboy in the 1930s seems unfair.