• shinratdr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Agreed, but not requiring labeling or some sort of method to identify was a real fuckup on their part.

    My problem isn’t the existence of different tiers of cable, it’s that there is literally no way to know if the cable you’re using supports something until you try it.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agreed, but not requiring labeling or some sort of method to identify was a real fuckup on their part.

      Yeah, we used to have that. It was great. They even made it so you couldn’t even fit the wrong cable in a port. They did that by having different connectors for different cables.

      • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah but with modern thin & light mobile devices, that’s a bad solution. Then you need multiple holes to serve multiple purposes, which impacts waterproofing and requires extra space & hardware.

        One port to rule them all makes sense. But it should have had a way to identify cables capability at a glance. I still prefer having one cable that can charge all my devices, even if the trade off is some confusing situations when it comes to cable capability.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is this true? There’s no app to test these by plugging them into your phone? No chip in them that encodes a spec sheet?