• deft@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    because that’s not how they do the math lol

    there is a lot more than that. which is why the number you got and that number is wrong.

    Weird right? You put actual thought in and realize that’s not truthful. Interesting huh?

    • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ok, let’s ignore Reuters because they’re probably Chinese shills or the IMF estimating 5.4%, 0.2% higher than the official CCP figure released in Jan because the International Monetary Fund are communist shills as well.

      You’ve already got it set in your mind, no amount of evidence from even western sources will change your mind, I get it.

      But, hypothetically, it was proven to be 5%. Would you go back and question the sources that told you it wasn’t? Or continue to chug along as you are now, taking those sources at face value?

      Chinese journalists who under reported figures 4.8% at the start of Jan found out they were wrong and retracted the articles because it was factually incorrect, western media pounced on it because “Wow China’s censoring journalists that says the economy is bad, therefore the only conclusion is their economy is bad, that’s the conclusion we’re implying here” and then a few days later even Reuters was like “oh yeah it was over 5%” and it’s crickets from the people that implied “China SCRUBS CLEAN ALL EVIDENCE OF BAD ECONOMY” you’ll continue to remember it as the latter for the rest of your life.