Looking for a normie KDE distro that works out of the box and is stable without issues.

  • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Kubuntu is most normie. Its just Ubuntu but with KDE instead of Gnome. KDE Neon has the latest KDE but the update process is a mess so I can’t recommend it.

    Personally I use EndeavourOS with KDE and find it very easy. Updates are literally just typing yay. But I understand that Arch based distros aren’t for everyone.

    • ghen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m using kubuntu right now. Test it out fedora for about 3 hours before I ran into a bug and went back to the KUbuntu hard drive. Normie means it just works, or at the very least googling the answer leads to good solutions. Only ubuntu has that

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, great KDE defaults - up to date - stable. Does things a bit differently than most distros but it’s pretty easy to get used to.

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I use stable but if you need more up to date software not in backports unstable would be better suited. Neither are really “unstable”.

  • ReCursing@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m using Manjaro because SuSE Tubleweed didn’t want to install that day. People like to hate on Manjaro but I honestly don’t know why - the defaults are fine and I very rarely have issues despite using software from the AUR

      • ReCursing@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It has been 442d 15h 07m 53s since Manjaro !$%&?*# up.

        So a year and a half? That’s not all that bad really. And that time it was a (admittedly bloody stupid) cock up involving the SSL certificate of their website not of the distro itself

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sure, maybe they’re better now, but this long list is why the reputation stuck.

          That and EndeavourOS exists

          • ReCursing@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Also I’ve just actually looked at EndeavourOS’ website and it says very clearly front and centre that it’s focused on the terminal, which is entirely not what OP was even asking for. It might be a fine distro, I don’t know, I’ve never used it or checked how many years it is since they cocked up, but it doesn’t present itself as a KDE focused distro which is what OP (and I) want!

            • maness300@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I keep saying that’s what turns me off from endeavor as a Manjaro user.

              That, and it seems like all the people suggesting it don’t really have their minds grounded in reality.

              A lot of them legitimately believe Arch is a sufficient replacement for Manjaro, and that just tells me they aren’t worth taking seriously.

              There’s a lot of 🧩 in the FOSS space, and I think we should acknowledge it for what it is instead of putting it on a pedestal.

          • ReCursing@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Or maybe you just have a weird bee in your bonnet about something that’s not even really a problem as evidenced from your own numbers

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Why? Because after a series of negligent incidents spanning multiple years, a couple of which impacted the AUR for everyone they’ve gone a year and a bit without another major incident?

                  Again, EndeavourOS exists – all Manjaro does for you is hold back packages making things unstable.

          • maness300@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t have any issues with the complaints often mentioned about Manjaro.

            Linux Mint, on the other hand, once got hacked and hosted malware on their website :(

            But I’m sure you’re as quick to tell people about that as you are to tell people about Manjaro.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              But I’m sure you’re as quick to tell people about that as you are to tell people about Manjaro.

              Why would I tell people about something I’ve never heard of before? Go shove your snide attitude up your ass.

              Also pretty disingenuous to compare a single incident of being hacked with a pattern of sloppiness and negligence.

              • maness300@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Well, you’ve heard about it now so I fully expect you to take up the crusade like you have against manjaro, unless you’re biased/tribalist.

                Also pretty disingenuous to compare a single incident of being hacked with a pattern of sloppiness and negligence.

                No it’s not, lol. Being infected with malware is worse than anything the Manjaro team has done. If you disagree, then you’re just not worth taking seriously.

                Let’s be honest though, you’re not worth taking seriously because you just do what you think will make you look good in front of your peers.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  If you thinking getting hacked once is comparable to a multi-year pattern of being clearly negligent and sloppy, then there’s not much hope for you.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I highly recommend Kubuntu. I don’t use any snaps though. And I always install the LTS version. Been using it for over a dozen years.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t use any snaps though.

      Oh sweet summer child…

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Stable”, really? Delaying packages isn’t stable, in fact it can break AUR packages.

      • maness300@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I never had an issue and I’ve been using Manjaro exclusively for 3+ years.

        I think Arch has had issues that Manjaro was able to avoid in the meantime because Manjaro doesn’t push updates as quickly as Arch.