• Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Maybe you are simple but I clearly described that to me it’s chicken. I get with your slacktivism you think you are saving the world but you just look silly to me. While you not buying chicken shows you are stopping whatever imaginary threat you think is real, I don’t buy the chicken because I don’t like it. I can’t prove a negative. When you google, it comes back with nothing recent since CFA stopped donating to certain groups many years ago.

    • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, I can see that someone who moves the goalposts this often isn’t worth arguing with. Maybe just state the point you really want to make the first time instead of being sheepish about it?

      Also, “slacktivism”? Man, I can’t take you seriously. How hilarious would it be though— you’re so quick to assume people don’t do anything but argue on the internet, someone’s gonna show you up someday. You honestly sound a whole lot like you’re projecting about “slacktivism”. But oh well, onto reading the next Lemmy post.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I never moved the goal post. It’s chicken. Nothing more but chicken. My gay BIL works there and loves his job. He is treated well and it’s owned by a gay couple. Yet, you think you are going to help him by not eating the chicken? How strange.

        Are you simple? I am the opposite of slacktivism. If I wanted CFA, I would go eat it because of the good they do. THe only reason I don’t eat it is I don’t like it.

        I am sure you are leading the good fight in the real world. lol… that made me chuckle, thank you. You consider not buying a chicken sandwich as sticking it to the man and for that, we are not the same.