• xthexder@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We got nerd sniped at almost the exact same time, but approached this in very different ways. I applaud your practical approach, but based on what I calculated, you should stop now. It will never reach 99.999%

      • xthexder@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        99.5% would still be e^200 numbers checked (7x10^86). According to the Quora link in my other comment, we’ve only calculated primes in sequence up to 4x10^18 as of 7 years ago. 95% is very doable though.

        Edited to correct first N primes vs primes up to N.