You check the crash logs

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an ontological argument. OP is creating a categorical distinction where “sound” is the cognitive process by which pressure waves are perceived, eg as information. I think it’s a fairly common distinction to make, but it is also kind of unsatisfying is the sense that it feels a bit like linguistic nihilism.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is tinnitus a sound?

        Is bone conduction sound?

        Are the signals a cochlear implant produce sound?

        Sound is a perception. Sound waves are what can generate that perception. But sound doesn’t always require soundwaves, so there is a difference.

        It’s very much a “dancing on the head of a pin” distinction, but the baseline joke also requires it.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, those all are sounds.

          From Wikipedia:

          Tinnitus is a variety of sound that is heard when no corresponding external sound is present.

          Should have been more distinct. Sounds are just vibration, they don’t need to go through air.

    • winged_fluffy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes and no. It all depends in what field you’re describing sound. In physics, a tree that fell in the forest most definitely made a sound. In psychology, it doesn’t.

      In physics, sound is a vibration that propagates as an acoustic wave through a transmission medium such as a gas, liquid or solid.

      In human physiology and psychology, sound is the reception of such waves and their perception by the brain.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound

      To be honest, I’m with the physicists.