hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agocountinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down110
arrow-up1185arrow-down1imagecountinglemmy.worldhairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoIf you count in binary you can get to 31 on one hand, and 2,047 on two hands
minus-square30p87@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoOne hand would be 2**5 = 32 (0 to 31) and two would be 2**10 = 1024 (0 to 1023). And if you use 3 states per finger (down, half raised and raised), you can have 3**10 = 59049 (0 to 59048).
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t count to 1024 over often (literally never) so I don’t feel the need to go to trinary.
minus-squareLudwig van Beethoven@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agonah, you can have 16+8+4+2+1 = 31 on one hand, and 1024+512+256+128+64+32+16+8+4+2+1=2047 on two hands.
If you count in binary you can get to 31 on one hand, and 2,047 on two hands
One hand would be 2**5 = 32 (0 to 31) and two would be 2**10 = 1024 (0 to 1023).
And if you use 3 states per finger (down, half raised and raised), you can have 3**10 = 59049 (0 to 59048).
I don’t count to 1024 over often (literally never) so I don’t feel the need to go to trinary.
nah, you can have 16+8+4+2+1 = 31 on one hand, and 1024+512+256+128+64+32+16+8+4+2+1=2047 on two hands.