• LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    Theoretically, having multiple streaming platforms should be good, as it prevents a monopoly. Problem is, they all have monopolies, on specific shows. Choosing the streaming services you want isn’t about choosing the better product, but on which shows you have. All streaming shows should have all shows available. That’s the only way to properly decide which service is worth paying for

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      But then they’d have to compete on features and usability, and no company wants that. They prefer to set up roadblocks and extract tolls.

    • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Woah there! Having the privilege to choose a streaming service that has a show you want. Those are some bold assumptions. We over here at anime land have former illegal streaming services with exclusive global licenses, even though they only operate nationally. Pirates overseas can’t watch their favorite anime of the season legally. They must either use a VPN to pay for a service that’ll ban them for VPN usage, or pirate the anime.

    • java@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This sounds like they have to compete for your money and produce better shows, which is good for consumers. You can subscribe to service X, watch the show you’re interested in, and unsubscribe. Netflix releases all episodes at once, with other platforms you can simply wait till the show ends before subscribing.

      I don’t argue that you should do exactly that instead of pirating. But I don’t see why somebody should be subscribed to all these services.

      • LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well my point is they wouldn’t be subscribed to all the services. They’d pick one. You wanna watch “Show A”. None of these platforms are allowed to have exclusivity rights to it. So do you choose Netflix? Hulu? Amazon? It’s up to you, since you don’t have to choose only the one that has it. Now your decision to give money to Netflix, for example, is based on the fact that the service they’re providing–UI, ease of access, streaming speed–instead of them being the only ones who have “Show A”

        • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could implement this for some shows and movies, but there’s one big problem. Disney shouldn’t have exclusivity rights to their own IPs? Netflix should have to give everyone else the shows they pay for and produce?

          I get where you’re coming from in theory, but in practice it doesn’t make sense. It would be like saying Nintendo must release their games on xbox and playstation.

          • LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My issue is that Disney should then not have its own streaming platform, and that, yeah, Netflix shouldn’t make its own shows

            Now as for the videogame comparison, I’ve heard it before, but developing for different consoles is not the same. Making a game for switch hardware, and for xbox hardware requires multiple versions of the game. You don’t film multiple versions of a movie for different platforms. It’s part of why I don’t think all games should be available on all platforms. I believe that they shouldn’t have to be on all platforms, and that it should be up to developers which consoles to make games for, but yeah, that means that there are gonna be exclusivity deals. Would be nice to avoid, so that if Fromsoft decides to make BB2, they have the free reign to make it for PC, but my point is that game development is more complicated than movie streaming

            Anyway, yeah, I think Disney+ can go fuck itself right back from the muck it crawled out of, and that Netflix has to stop making its own stuff (Or allow competitors to use it)

      • LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, yeah. If I can watch Cartoon Network regardless of my cable provider, then I’m choosing them based on how well they provide for me that cable. They do good work, get reliable cables, fix outages quickly, are affordable, fucking great

      • LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then they better step up their game. Compete with each other by improving their services, or lowering the prices to draw in customers

    • spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      isn’t about choosing the better product, but on which shows you have.

      But you can argue that part of what makes a streaming service a good product, is the literal product they produce, their content.

      • LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A streaming service’s product is the service of streaming stuff to you. It’s not a studio. Studios make those products. The streaming services give you a platform to watch them. Their product is their website

        • spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re a publisher whose content is hosted on their own streaming service. It’s classic vertical integration.

          I think the current model is better actually, because then the streaming services have to compete with each other on content, user experience, and price.

          This way, you only need to subscribe to the streaming services that have the shows you’re currently watching, and can cancel whenever you’re done with those shows, until the next one comes along.

          If a streaming service bundles multiple studios shows together, then you’re paying for a ton of content you may not even care about, just like how cable is.

          At the end of the day, unless someone is watching hours and hours of tv a day, it’s unlikely they need to simultaneously subscribe to 7 streaming services.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Netflix is literally 6x more expensive while having like 6x less content too. and the content they do produce is garbage.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean, they have lots of good shows that get cancelled after one season with the story on a cliff hanger

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey this is only the 900.000. time I see this, this year. Maybe post it more often so we can come to 1.000.000 !

  • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use to torrent everything until Netflix and as competitors began popping up it was fine as it was convenient but now I can’t keep up with what’s where. Had to dust off the hat and learned to set up a server for jellyfin. I tried being fair but they got greedy

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    There used to be a time when you could watch Hulu without a subscription. Times change. Some other times loop.

    • johy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like the other replies said, it’s Viaplay. I don’t know about other countries but it’s fairly common here in Sweden.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I remember having some reservations and skepticism regarding the ongoing good faith of Netflix when it was the new hotness.

    I was called, you may have guessed, a Luddite, and told that "it would be bad business" if Netflix fucked people over and that it’d be silly to hold on to physical copies of entertainment media.

    Now I’m basically this face to the same people i-told-you-dog

  • settinmoon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another main reason why I took off my hat back then was because I was a broke college kid with garbage internet speed and my only computer was a laptop. Torrenting shows sometimes means I need to have my laptop on for days. Now I have an entire homelab setup with a dedicated VM on one of my servers for torrenting and I can afford fast internet. I was pleasantly surprised how efficiently I can torrent when I got back sailing recently.

  • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems like the same issue as cable. It’s not a la carte like we were promised, we get bundles of shows. So my pet peeve is I’d have to subsidize fox news if I want a news package. Not happening. I don’t watch 90% of these package deals. It’s almost $90 a month for Hulu live, and it keeps going up.