• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Really? You think people had their businesses burned down and their town destroyed and thought to themselves “boy I hope these people get what they wanted!” or do you think they thought “These people are human garbage and I hope they rot in prison”? Which one of these thought processes makes more sense to you?

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The protests started because the police murdered a man in full view of a group of witnesses, a lot of people had a vested interest in making sure that didn’t happen again, in a way that non violent protest would not have achieved.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Quite the opposite. A non-violent protest would have achieved much more. The rioters and looters only obstructed the cause.