In case anyone else would like to know without having to click the link. It’s an article titled “28 years later” and is about the movie 28 Days Later and a potential sequel called 28 Years Later.
I’ve posted perhaps 10 things in total including this, since I started using reddit and now lemmy more than 10 years ago. So this criticism has been helpful, I hope you find the new title to be more to your liking.
Awful title for a post.
In case anyone else would like to know without having to click the link. It’s an article titled “28 years later” and is about the movie 28 Days Later and a potential sequel called 28 Years Later.
Oh ok.
I’ve posted perhaps 10 things in total including this, since I started using reddit and now lemmy more than 10 years ago. So this criticism has been helpful, I hope you find the new title to be more to your liking.
No worries. A better title might be something like:
“MovieWeb article on a potential to 28 Days Later”
It’s best to be descriptive and concise. Don’t make it vague or try to be clever to entice someone by piquing their interest.
The point of posting these links to sites like Lemmy/Reddit is to get past the click-baity stuff for each other.
Why not just “28 Years Later? 28 Days Later Director & Writer Tease Potential Third Installment”