Title says it all (i have turned on 165hz on settings). Its a cheap monitor, do some 165hz monitors not truly give you that experience? Or are my eyes fucked

  • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The difference shouldn’t be miniscule, though. If you’ve never been able to see a difference, my money’s on not setting the refresh rate in Windows. It’s not automatic.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s mostly marketing. Films are perfect at 24fps and gamer bros think they can see framerates ten times that.

      • midnight@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really? Movies at 24 fps are tolerable because we’re used to it and there’s a lot of motion blur, but any motion or panning shot still looks incredibly jerky. You have to get way up into the 100s of fps before you hit diminishing returns of smoothness, and even then it’s still noticeable.