22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet::The Kids Online Safety Act is “a blank check” for Republican AGs to “intimidate any way they can,” a digital civil liberties advocate told Jezebel.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    We want to force the entire world to block information that we don’t like (says the small government club)

    Good luck with that

      • CmdrUlle@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firstly, the EU is not about small government, so half of the joke is lost already. Secondly, rampant misinformation vs. factual information about abortion…

        But sure, it’s all the same.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Creating a censorship apparatus is dangerous, because the person who gets to decide what gets censored has lots of power, and power corrupt over time.

          And what might be considered flagrant propaganda to one party, might seem just like political spin to another party.

          I think we’re all better off if we let people say what they say, and then evaluate the individuals by their words, rather than by approved content. I don’t see any sustainable way of approving content that doesn’t introduce bias and censorship unduly

        • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do you know that everything would be factual ?

          Os there anyway to guarantee it would be ?